Clin2
NCT07408726Likely a fitRecruiting

Two screw types for stabilizing recent spine fractures

ThoracolumbarFractures in the Elderly

Part of Bones, joints & muscles, Injuries & trauma clinical trials.

This study compares two ways of doing a minimally invasive back surgery to stabilize a recent spine fracture. It looks at whether using screws that can be angled in one direction versus all directions gives better results.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
44 people
Ages
60 years and older
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • At least 60 years old.
  • Fracture in the T11 to L4 area of your spine (mid to lower back), within the last 4 weeks.
  • No major nerve problems from the fracture (like weakness or numbness in your legs).
  • Able to walk before the fracture, even with a walker or cane.
  • No other major back surgery planned in the next year.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07071870Not yet recruiting
Comparing two minimally invasive treatments for unstable spine fractures

This study compares two ways to fix unstable spine fractures caused by osteoporosis. One is a newer, minimally invasive technique (called SAIF) and the other is standard spinal fusion surgery. The goal is to see which approach relieves pain and stabilizes the spine better with fewer side effects.

Lugano, Canton Ticino
NCT07777653Not yet recruiting
Short versus long screw fixation for thoracolumbar fracture

This study compares two ways to fix a broken bone in the back with screws to see which better corrects and holds the spine's shape. It may help you if you have a single-level break with no nerve damage.

Asyut, Abnoub
NCT07294417Recruiting
Bone cement screws vs. special screws for weak spine bones

This study compares two types of screws used to fix spine fractures or instability in people with brittle bones (osteoporosis). One type uses bone cement to strengthen the screw, and the other uses a special hollow screw. The goal is to see which method works better for reducing pain and stabilizing the spine.

Kafr ash Shaykh, Kafrelsheikh
NCT07645092Not yet recruiting
Study of bone cement and screws for a single spine fracture

This study reviews outcomes for people who had a certain surgery for a single broken vertebra in the mid-to-lower back. It aims to see how well the surgery works and if it is beneficial.

NCT07209280Enrolling by invitation
New screw system for pelvic fracture repair

This trial tests a newer type of screw to fix certain pelvic fractures. It aims to see if it works better than the standard screw for helping bones heal and for you to get back on your feet.

Salt Lake City, Utah
NCT07027306Recruiting
New score to guide treatment for osteoporotic spine fractures

This study tests a new classification system to help doctors decide the best treatment for spine fractures caused by osteoporosis. It aims to improve pain and mobility by matching treatment to fracture type.

San Francisco, California

Hear when a new Thoracolumbar trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.