Clin2
NCT07071870Possibly a fitNot yet recruiting

Minimally invasive SAIF surgery vs spinal fusion for osteoporotic fractures

Unstable Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures

Part of Bones, joints & muscles, Injuries & trauma clinical trials.

This study tests a new, less invasive surgery called SAIF against standard spinal fusion for people with painful, unstable spine fractures caused by osteoporosis. The goal is to find out which approach works better and is safer.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
140 people
Ages
50 years and older
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You have 1 or 2 broken vertebrae in your mid or lower back that are unstable and happened less than 3 months ago (or still show bone swelling on an MRI).
  • You have pain when you move, like when standing up or walking.
  • You have been diagnosed with osteoporosis (bone thinning) based on a bone density test or because you broke a vertebra easily.
  • You can speak and read the local language (English, French, or Dutch) and agree to the study rules.
  • You do not have nerve damage causing numbness or weakness in your arms or legs, active infection, cancer in the spine, or serious mental health conditions.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07301749Recruiting
Study of VCFix device for spine fractures

This trial tests a new device called VCFix to treat a single broken vertebra in the mid-to-lower back. It aims to see if the device is safe and effective for relieving pain and restoring spine function.

Chambéry
NCT06670404Recruiting
Combination treatment for painful spinal fractures

This study tests a combination treatment for painful spinal fractures caused by thinning bones (osteoporosis) or tumors. It may help people with one or more recently broken vertebrae in the mid or lower back.

Lausanne
NCT05769114Recruiting
Surgery vs non-surgery for a specific back fracture

This study compares surgery and non-surgical care for an acute burst fracture in the middle-to-lower back. The goal is to see which approach works better for healing and recovery.

Bern
NCT06093087Not yet recruiting· Phase 1/Phase 2
Stent screw vs. balloon for spine fracture pain

This trial compares two minimally invasive surgeries—a stent screw or balloon kyphoplasty—to treat painful spinal fractures caused by osteoporosis. It aims to find which approach better relieves pain and restores function in older adults.

NCT07321795Not yet recruiting
Osteoporosis-related spinal fracture study

This study looks at people who have a spine fracture caused by osteoporosis (weak bones). If you qualify, researchers will follow your health over time. The study also includes people with different levels of bone strength to compare results.

Hunan, Changsha
NCT05981222Enrolling by invitation
Osteo Match vs. PEEK cages for spinal fusion in osteoporosis

This study compares two types of cages used in spinal fusion surgery for people with osteoporosis. It aims to see if one type leads to better bone healing and stability.

Beijing, Beijing Municipality

Hear when a new Unstable Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.