Clin2
NCT07071870Possibly a fitNot yet recruiting

Comparing two minimally invasive treatments for unstable spine fractures

Unstable Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures

Part of Bones, joints & muscles, Injuries & trauma clinical trials.

This study compares two ways to fix unstable spine fractures caused by osteoporosis. One is a newer, minimally invasive technique (called SAIF) and the other is standard spinal fusion surgery. The goal is to see which approach relieves pain and stabilizes the spine better with fewer side effects.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
140 people
Ages
50 years and older
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You have 1 or 2 broken vertebrae in your mid or lower back (between your shoulder blades and lower spine), and the break is unstable.
  • The fracture is either less than 3 months old, still shows bone swelling on an MRI, or the bone didn't heal properly (pseudarthrosis).
  • You have pain when you move or try to walk.
  • You have been diagnosed with osteoporosis (low bone density) or you had a fracture from a minor fall or no obvious cause.
  • You can read and speak the local language and are willing to give written consent.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07301749Recruiting
Study of VCFix device for spine fractures

This trial tests a new device called VCFix to treat a single broken vertebra in the mid-to-lower back. It aims to see if the device is safe and effective for relieving pain and restoring spine function.

Chambéry
NCT07408726Recruiting
Two screw types for stabilizing recent spine fractures

This study compares two ways of doing a minimally invasive back surgery to stabilize a recent spine fracture. It looks at whether using screws that can be angled in one direction versus all directions gives better results.

Innsbruck, Tyrol
NCT06670404Recruiting
Combination treatment for painful spinal fractures

This study tests a combination treatment for painful spinal fractures caused by thinning bones (osteoporosis) or tumors. It may help people with one or more recently broken vertebrae in the mid or lower back.

Lausanne
NCT05769114Recruiting
Surgery vs non-surgery for a specific back fracture

This study compares surgery and non-surgical care for an acute burst fracture in the middle-to-lower back. The goal is to see which approach works better for healing and recovery.

Bern
NCT06093087Not yet recruiting· Phase 1/Phase 2
Stent screw surgery for spinal fractures from osteoporosis

This trial tests a new surgery using a stent screw to fix spinal fractures caused by osteoporosis. It may help reduce pain and improve function compared to standard balloon kyphoplasty.

NCT07534579Not yet recruiting
Open vs. minimally invasive surgery for unstable sacral fractures

This study compares two surgical methods for fixing unstable fractures of the sacrum (the bone at the base of the spine). It aims to see if a less invasive approach works as well as traditional open surgery, potentially leading to faster recovery and fewer complications.

Hear when a new Unstable Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.