Clin2
NCT07523074Possibly a fitRecruiting

Early vs. delayed shock wave treatment for leftover kidney stones

Nephrolithiasis

Part of Kidney & urinary, Women’s health & pregnancy clinical trials.

This trial compares two timing schedules for using shock waves to break up small kidney stones that remain after a surgical procedure. The goal is to find the best time to treat these leftover stones to help them pass naturally and prevent complications.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
476 people
Ages
18 years to 70 years
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • Age 18–70 years old
  • Have small leftover kidney stones (15 mm or smaller) after a percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedure (a surgical procedure to remove larger stones)
  • Normal kidney function (serum creatinine less than 1.5 mg/dL, meaning your kidneys are working well)
  • No active urinary tract infection at the time of enrollment
  • No bleeding disorders or current use of blood-thinning medications
  • No blocked kidney drainage or active blood infection

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07261995Recruiting
Shock wave vs. laser surgery for kidney stones

This trial compares two procedures to break up a single kidney stone. One uses sound waves from outside the body, the other uses a laser through a small scope. Both aim to help you pass the stone more easily.

Karachi, Sindh
NCT07193940Not yet recruiting
Flexible tube versus shock wave for lower kidney stones

This study compares two common procedures to remove a kidney stone from the lower part of the kidney: flexible ureteroscopy (a tube with a camera to break up the stone) and shock wave lithotripsy (using sound waves from outside the body to break the stone). It helps determine which method works better for stones up to 15 millimeters.

Asyut
NCT07421843Enrolling by invitation
Shorter vs longer wait between shockwave treatments for kidney stones

This study compares two different waiting times between shockwave treatments for kidney stones that are 8 to 15 mm. They want to see if a longer or shorter gap between sessions works better to break up the stone.

Helsingborg
NCT07334236Not yet recruiting
Comparing two ways to deliver sound wave therapy for kidney stones

This study compares two ways of delivering sound wave therapy (ESWL) to break up kidney or ureter stones. One approach gradually increases the energy, while the other uses a fixed level, and the goal is to see which is more effective and comfortable for patients like you.

Sohag
NCT02298465Recruiting
Shockwave treatment for a kidney stone: lying down two ways

This trial studies whether kidney-stone shockwave treatment works better when you lie on your back (supine) versus on your stomach (prone). It focuses on adults with a stone in the lower part of the urine tube (the distal ureter).

Hong Kong
NCT07299032Not yet recruiting
Ultrasound-guided shock wave treatment for children with kidney stones

This study tests a more precise ultrasound-guided shock wave treatment for children with kidney stones. Shock waves break stones into smaller pieces that can pass in urine, and this approach may be safer and more effective by using a special tracking system.

Hangzhou, Zhejiang

Hear when a new Nephrolithiasis trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.