Clin2
NCT07591324Possibly a fitRecruiting

3D-Printed vs. Traditional Space Holders for Kids' Teeth

Gingival HealthSpace MaintenancePain and Anxiety

Part of Mental health, Pain clinical trials.

This study compares two types of dental devices that hold space in a child's mouth after baby molars fall out early. The research tests whether a newer 3D-printed version works as well as or better than the traditional wire-based device.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
44 people
Ages
7 years to 9 years
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • Child is between 7 and 9 years old
  • Lost more than one baby molar on the lower jaw recently
  • Lower front permanent teeth and back permanent molars have fully come in
  • Teeth are healthy, cavity-free, and gums are in good condition
  • No habits like thumb-sucking, teeth grinding, or bite problems (like crossbite or overbite)
  • Parent and child agree to try the new 3D-printed device

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT06825273Recruiting
3D-printed space maintainer for lost baby molars

This study tests a 3D-printed space maintainer (like a small partial denture) for children who have lost a lower baby molar early. It helps keep space for the permanent tooth to come in properly.

Tanta
NCT06965777Not yet recruiting
Tracking space changes after baby molar loss using digital scanning

This study uses a 3D digital scanner to see what happens to the space in a child's mouth after a lower first baby molar is removed, when no space maintainer is used. It may help dentists better understand natural tooth movement in young children.

Cairo
NCT07853313Not yet recruiting
Space maintainers for children who lost a back tooth

This study compares two types of space maintainers (devices that hold space for permanent teeth) in children who lost a lower second molar early. It aims to find which device works better to prevent teeth from shifting and causing bite problems.

Giza, Giza Governorate
NCT07648979Not yet recruiting
3D-printed crowns vs metal crowns for baby teeth after nerve treatment

This study compares two types of crowns for baby molars that have had nerve treatment. One type is made with a 3D printer, and the other is the standard stainless steel crown. The goal is to see which crown works better for children's teeth.

Cairo
NCT06750068Not yet recruiting
3D-printed vs traditional space maintainers for children

This study compares two types of dental devices that keep space open in a child's mouth after losing a baby tooth, so the permanent tooth can come in properly. One device is 3D-printed and the other is a standard metal one.

NCT06798090Recruiting
Comparing 3D-printed vs. traditional dental space maintainers

This trial tests two ways of making a small dental device that holds space for adult teeth when baby molars are lost early. It compares a 3D-printed version with a conventionally made one, to see which works better and is more comfortable.

Aydin, Aydın

Hear when a new Gingival Health trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.