Clin2
NCT07633834Possibly a fitNot yet recruiting

Saving versus replacing a damaged molar tooth

Root CariesVertical Root Fracture

Part of Mouth & dental clinical trials.

This study compares two approaches for molars (back teeth) with severe damage to one root: either a surgery to save the tooth by removing the damaged root, or replacing it with a dental implant. The goal is to see which option works better for patients.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
28 people
Ages
21 years to 60 years
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You have good oral hygiene habits and are willing to attend follow-up appointments
  • The damage is limited to one root of the molar (the other root is healthy)
  • Your tooth damage cannot be fixed with standard dental treatments
  • You do not have uncontrolled diabetes, bleeding disorders, or immune system problems
  • You have not had radiation therapy to the head or neck area
  • You smoke 10 cigarettes per day or less

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07608497Not yet recruiting
Saving or replacing damaged upper back teeth

This study compares two approaches for upper back teeth (molars) that are severely damaged: either removing just the damaged root part and keeping the tooth, or extracting the tooth and placing a dental implant. The goal is to see which approach works better for your situation.

NCT07633574Not yet recruiting
Two methods for rebuilding a root-canal-treated molar

This study compares two ways to rebuild a molar tooth that has had a root canal: one uses a 3D printer (additive), the other uses traditional milling (subtractive). The goal is to see which method lasts longer and works better over 2 years.

NCT06654141Recruiting
Healing time and tooth socket preservation after molar extraction

This study looks at how different healing times affect the success of preserving the bone where a molar is removed due to gum disease. It aims to find the best wait time before placing a dental implant.

Shanghai
NCT07437794Not yet recruiting
Comparing two treatments for saving baby back teeth

This study compares two treatments for saving a decayed baby back tooth: a newer material called Neo Putty MTA and a standard medicine called formocresol. Both are used during a procedure (pulpotomy) that removes the infected part of the tooth nerve to keep the tooth healthy until it falls out naturally.

Giza, Giza Governorate
NCT07770256Recruiting
Bone regeneration surgery for lower molar gum disease

This study looks at the shape of lower molar teeth with a certain type of gum disease and tests a surgical treatment to help regrow the bone around those teeth. If you have advanced gum disease and a lower molar with a specific type of bone loss, this treatment might help save the tooth.

Ho Chi Minh City
NCT07468760Not yet recruiting
Comparing two methods for replacing a front tooth with an implant

This trial tests two ways to place a dental implant right after pulling a front tooth that can't be saved. One method keeps a small piece of the tooth root (called a socket shield) and places a temporary crown right away. The other method waits a few months before placing the implant.

Ajman

Hear when a new Root Caries trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.