Clin2
NCT07719764Possibly a fitEnrolling by invitation

Implant stability with two different drilling methods for molar replacement

Immediate Dental Implant PlacementLower Molar Requiring Extraction

Part of Mouth & dental clinical trials.

This trial compares two drilling techniques for placing a dental implant right after removing a lower molar. It aims to see which method gives better initial stability of the implant, which is important for long-term success.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
20 people
Ages
20 years to 50 years
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You are between 20 and 50 years old.
  • You need to have a lower first or second molar pulled and replaced with a dental implant right away.
  • You have enough jaw bone to place the implant without extra bone grafting.
  • You have good oral hygiene and are willing to come back for follow-up visits.
  • You do not smoke or use tobacco.
  • You are not pregnant or breastfeeding.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07077915Enrolling by invitation
New drilling method vs. standard for immediate dental implants

This trial tests a new drilling method called osseodensification (which makes the bone denser) versus the standard way of drilling for placing a dental implant right after pulling a tooth. It is for people who need a lower back molar removed and want an implant placed immediately.

Beirut
NCT04319042Recruiting
Same-day versus 4-week dental implant crown placement study

This study compares placing a crown on a dental implant either the same day as the implant or 4 weeks later. It may help decide which timing leads to better healing and tooth function after an implant.

Bern, Canton of Bern
NCT06307691Recruiting
Comparing two implant placement methods after tooth removal

This trial compares two ways of placing a dental implant right after a tooth is removed. One method ('osseodensification') gently compacts the bone, while the other uses a traditional drilling technique. The study wants to see which method gives better bone support and healing.

Cairo
NCT07108361Recruiting
New implant technique for back teeth (molars)

This study tests a new way of placing dental implants in the back of the mouth that may help the implant stay stronger. If you need a molar implant, this approach might lead to better outcomes.

Cairo
NCT06989684Not yet recruiting
Dental implant stability with two drilling methods

This trial compares two ways of preparing the jawbone for dental implants to see which gives better implant stability. It is for people with low bone density in the back of the jaw who have been missing teeth for at least six months.

Rohtak, Haryana
NCT06207617Recruiting
Immediate implant after molar removal: with or without bone graft

This study tests whether placing a dental implant right after removing a lower molar works better with or without adding a bone graft. It looks at how the bone and gum change over time.

Cairo

Hear when a new Immediate Dental Implant Placement trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.