Clin2
NCT07653568Possibly a fitRecruiting

Comparing two ultrasound methods to guide fluid therapy in septic patients on ventilators

Fluid Responsiveness Predictability in Sepsis

Part of Infections clinical trials.

This study tests whether a neck ultrasound (carotid Doppler) or a heart ultrasound (echocardiography) is better at determining how much fluid a septic patient on a ventilator needs. If you or your loved one is in the ICU with sepsis on a breathing machine, this trial helps doctors choose the best way to give fluids that can improve blood pressure and organ function.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
94 people
Ages
12 years and older
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You are an adult in the ICU with sepsis and on a ventilator
  • You need extra fluids because of low blood pressure, fast heart rate, or low urine output
  • You do not have a brain injury or recent brain surgery that would make certain fluid tests unsafe
  • You do not have heart failure, severe heart valve problems, or a very irregular heartbeat
  • You do not have lung conditions like severe asthma, high blood pressure in the lungs, or a blood clot in the lung

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07797751Not yet recruiting
Ultrasound versus usual care for guiding fluid treatment in sepsis

This trial compares the use of a simple ultrasound test of the lungs and heart to help doctors decide how much fluid to give adults with septic shock. The goal is to find the most accurate way to guide treatment, which could lead to better recovery.

NCT07550400Recruiting
Ultrasound Imaging to Guide Septic Shock Treatment

This study tests whether using ultrasound (heart imaging and blood-vessel scanning) helps doctors treat septic shock—a life-threatening blood infection—more effectively. The trial measures whether these imaging tools help guide fluid and medication decisions during resuscitation.

Cairo
NCT07411469Recruiting
Comparing heart monitoring methods in sepsis patients

This study compares two methods to measure fluid responsiveness in patients with sepsis and hypotension: cardiometry (non-invasive heart monitoring) and ultrasound of the IVC vein. The goal is to find a simpler way to guide treatment.

Shibīn al Kawm, Menoufia
NCT07136532Recruiting
Predicting fluid needs in children with septic shock using ultrasound

This study tests whether using ultrasound of the neck (carotid artery) and heart can help doctors know which children with septic shock need more fluids. It aims to make fluid treatment safer and more precise in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).

Cairo
NCT07279064Not yet recruiting
Comparing two fluid checks in septic shock patients

This trial compares two ways to check if a patient with septic shock needs more IV fluids. It uses either a special measurement from a central line or an ultrasound of a large vein in the belly. The goal is to make sure you get just the right amount of fluid to help your blood pressure without overloading your heart.

NCT07685002Not yet recruiting
Fluid response test in critically ill patients with sepsis

This study looks at how the body responds to extra fluids in patients with severe infections (sepsis) who are on a breathing machine. It aims to understand how fluids affect blood flow and congestion to improve treatment.

Boulogne-Billancourt

Hear when a new Fluid Responsiveness Predictability in Sepsis trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.