Clin2
NCT06989684Possibly a fitNot yet recruiting

Dental implant stability with two drilling methods

Dental Implant Stability

Part of Mouth & dental clinical trials.

This trial compares two ways of preparing the jawbone for dental implants to see which gives better implant stability. It is for people with low bone density in the back of the jaw who have been missing teeth for at least six months.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
38 people
Ages
18 years and older
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You are at least 18 years old and generally healthy.
  • You have missing teeth in the back of your jaw and the extraction was at least 6 months ago.
  • Your jawbone in that area has low density.
  • You are not a smoker.
  • You are not pregnant or breastfeeding.
  • You do not have uncontrolled diabetes, high blood pressure, hormonal conditions, blood disorders, or sinus problems.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07586475Not yet recruiting
Comparing two methods for placing dental implants to improve stability

This study compares two ways of placing dental implants — a new method using special Densah burs to compact the bone, versus the traditional drilling method. It aims to see which approach makes the implant more stable at the start.

NCT06992557Not yet recruiting
Comparing two drilling methods for dental implants in the lower back jaw

This study compares two ways of preparing your jawbone for a dental implant: the usual method (conventional drilling) and a newer 'biological drilling' approach. The goal is to see which method leads to better healing and success for the implant.

Cairo
NCT06307691Recruiting
Comparing two implant placement methods after tooth removal

This trial compares two ways of placing a dental implant right after a tooth is removed. One method ('osseodensification') gently compacts the bone, while the other uses a traditional drilling technique. The study wants to see which method gives better bone support and healing.

Cairo
NCT07719764Enrolling by invitation
Implant stability with two different drilling methods for molar replacement

This trial compares two drilling techniques for placing a dental implant right after removing a lower molar. It aims to see which method gives better initial stability of the implant, which is important for long-term success.

Riyadh
NCT07077915Enrolling by invitation
New drilling method vs. standard for immediate dental implants

This trial tests a new drilling method called osseodensification (which makes the bone denser) versus the standard way of drilling for placing a dental implant right after pulling a tooth. It is for people who need a lower back molar removed and want an implant placed immediately.

Beirut
NCT07242716Not yet recruiting
Comparing two dental implant designs for upper jaw stability

This study compares two different implant thread designs to see which one helps the implant stay more stable in the upper jaw when placed using a bone-preserving technique called osseodensification. This could improve the long-term success of dental implants for people with limited jawbone width.

Hear when a new Dental Implant Stability trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.