Comparing two anaesthesia methods for weak hearts
This study compares two types of anaesthesia for people with a weakened heart (ejection fraction between 35-40%) who need planned lower-limb surgery. It looks at how each method affects blood pressure and heart function during and after the procedure.
Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.
Who can take part
- Aged between 18 and 70 years
- Scheduled for elective surgery on the lower limb (not emergency)
- Have a reduced ejection fraction (heart pumping strength) of 35-40%
- Classified as ASA II or III (mild to severe but not incapacitating health condition)
- No history of bleeding disorders, spinal deformities, infections, severe lung disease, psychiatric or neurological illness, or allergy to anaesthetics
- Body mass index (BMI) not over 35
Quick eligibility check
Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.
Similar studies
Other trials that look related to this one.
This study compares general anesthesia (you are completely asleep) versus spinal anesthesia (you are awake but numb from the waist down) during hip surgery to see which one is better at preventing heart muscle damage. It is for people 65 and older who are at moderate to high risk for heart problems.
This study compares two ways of giving spinal anesthesia (numbing medication in the back) for older adults having leg or hip surgery. It aims to see if adjusting the dose based on height works better than the standard fixed dose. If you are between 60 and 80 and having planned lower limb surgery, you may be eligible.
This study compares two medicines, milrinone and epinephrine, given during heart surgery to see which one helps the right side of the heart work better. It is for adults with some heart weakness before their operation.
This trial compares two types of anesthesia during heart surgery: one that uses high doses of strong painkillers (opioids) and one that uses less opioids. The goal is to see which approach is safer and helps patients recover better.
This trial compares two types of anesthesia (desflurane gas vs. propofol IV) during coronary artery bypass surgery to see which one is better for your heart. It might help patients who are having planned bypass surgery.
This study compares two ways of giving spinal anesthesia (midline vs. paramedian) using ultrasound guidance in adults having orthopedic surgery. The goal is to see which approach is safer and more effective.
Hear when a new Hemodynamic (MAP) Stability trial opens
We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.