Clin2
NCT07765771Possibly a fitNot yet recruiting

Comparing two robotic knee replacement techniques

Osteo Arthritis of the Knee

Part of Bones, joints & muscles clinical trials.

This trial compares two ways of doing robotic-assisted knee replacement surgery: a standard approach versus one using a smaller incision with a modified pin placement. The goal is to see if the less invasive technique leads to better recovery and outcomes.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
100 people
Ages
18 years and older
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • 18 years or older
  • Have be diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis that needs a knee replacement
  • Your body mass index must be below 30
  • Be able to bend your knee at least 90 degrees (right angle)
  • No prior surgery on the same knee
  • No inflammatory arthritis (like rheumatoid) or conditions like Parkinson's, stroke, or polio

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07551856Recruiting
Robotic vs. manual knee replacement surgery for arthritis

This study compares two ways to perform knee replacement surgery for osteoarthritis: traditional manual surgery versus robotic-assisted surgery. Both are standard approaches; the trial tests whether robotic guidance improves how well your knee works after surgery.

Glasgow, Scotland
NCT05290818Recruiting
Robotic vs standard knee replacement for inner-joint wear

This trial compares robotic-assisted knee replacement with the usual (non-robotic) approach for people with severe arthritis on the inner (medial) side of the knee. It aims to see which method works better for pain and function while matching the right knee anatomy for certain implant types.

Edinburgh, Lothian
NCT06856356Recruiting
Robot-assisted knee replacement surgery study

This study tests if robot-assisted total knee replacement surgery is safe and effective. It may help people who need knee replacement surgery by using advanced technology for more precise implant placement.

Hefei, Anhui
NCT06389435Recruiting
Robotic versus conventional knee replacement surgery

This study compares two ways of performing total knee replacement surgery: one using a robotic assistant and the other using traditional techniques. The goal is to see if robotic-assisted surgery leads to better outcomes for patients.

Hässleholm
NCT07201207Not yet recruiting
Robotic versus manual total knee replacement for knee arthritis

This study compares two ways of performing total knee replacement surgery: one where the surgeon uses a robotic arm to guide the cutting, and one where the surgeon works by hand. The goal is to see if the robotic method leads to better implant placement and recovery.

NCT06280352Recruiting
Robotic vs custom knee replacement trial

This study compares two modern ways of doing knee replacement: robot-assisted surgery versus a custom-made implant tailored to your knee shape. It aims to see which approach leads to better recovery and function for people with osteoarthritis.

Graz, Styria

Hear when a new Osteo Arthritis of the Knee trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.