Clin2
NCT04475510Possibly a fitRecruiting

Stop blood-thinner therapy after PFO closure in younger stroke patients

Patent Foramen OvaleIschemic StrokeBleeding Ulcer

Part of Brain & nervous system, Genetic & congenital, Heart & circulation clinical trials.

This trial tests whether it’s safe to stop antithrombotic (blood-thinner) treatment after a successful hole-in-the-heart procedure (PFO closure) in people age 60 and under who had an unexplained stroke or TIA. It may help some people avoid long-term blood-thinner side effects if their risk stays low.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
100 people
Ages
18 years to 60 years
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You are 60 years old or younger
  • You had a successful PFO closure procedure using an approved device
  • Your stroke or TIA was “cryptogenic,” meaning the cause wasn’t found, and you meet the study’s scoring (RoPE score 6 or higher)
  • After the PFO closure, there is no moderate-or-higher leftover leak (residual shunt must be less than moderate)
  • You do not have atrial fibrillation after the PFO closure and have not had another stroke/TIA within 1 year
  • You can have an MRI if needed and can sign informed consent

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT05907694Recruiting
Treatment of stroke from PFO, with or without closure

This study looks at whether treating a history of “cryptogenic” stroke (stroke with no clear cause) using a patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure, plus medical therapy, is better than medical therapy alone. It focuses on people over 60 with a heart shunt seen on an ultrasound of the heart.

Québec, Quebec
NCT05387954Recruiting· Phase 3
PFO closure or blood thinners after stroke in ages 60–80

This trial studies the best way to prevent another stroke after a recent stroke in people ages 60 to 80 who have a “PFO” heart connection. It compares closing the PFO vs taking mouth blood-thinners or antiplatelet medicine, based on what your doctors determine is safest for you.

Amiens
NCT06156670Recruiting
A study of closing a PFO to prevent strokes

This trial looks at the safety and results of closing a PFO (a small hole in the heart) in people who have had a stroke or embolism with no other clear cause. If you qualify, doctors will close your PFO using a small tube inserted through a blood vessel and then follow your health over time.

Moscow
NCT07479147Recruiting
Stroke prevention in elderly by PFO closure vs blood thinners

This trial compares two treatments for preventing another stroke in older adults who have a PFO (a small hole in the heart). It tests whether closing the hole with a device works better than using blood-thinning medication.

Taichung
NCT05537753Recruiting
PFO closure device test after recent unexplained stroke

This trial tests whether closing a hole in the heart (a PFO) with a special device can help prevent another stroke after an unexplained stroke. You may be a candidate if your stroke likely happened because blood can pass through this PFO.

Little Rock, Arkansas
NCT07698951Recruiting
Testing a new device to close PFO after stroke

This trial tests a new device to close a PFO (a small hole in the heart) in people who have had a stroke caused by a blood clot passing through that hole. The goal is to see if the device can prevent another stroke.

Belgrade

Hear when a new Patent Foramen Ovale trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.