Clin2
NCT05015660Possibly a fitRecruiting

Testing left bundle pacing versus usual right pacing

Pacemaker DDDHeart Block

Part of Heart & circulation clinical trials.

This study compares a newer heart pacing method (left bundle branch pacing) to the standard method (right ventricular pacing) in people who need most of their heartbeats paced. It may help improve how well the heart pumps over time.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
1,300 people
Ages
18 years and older
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You are 18 years or older
  • Your heart pumping strength (ejection fraction) is above 35%
  • You have a type of heart rhythm block where you will likely need right-side pacing more than 90% of the time
  • You have had an echocardiogram (ultrasound of the heart) within the last 3 months and can share the images
  • You can agree to take part in the study

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT05585411Recruiting
Pacemaker type test to reduce heart worsening and death risk

This study compares two pacemaker pacing strategies—left-sided “bundle branch area” pacing versus right-sided ventricular pacing. It aims to see which approach better prevents heart failure getting worse and reduces abnormal timing between heart chambers over time.

Bucheon-si
NCT07814612Recruiting
Guided pacing for heart failure with left bundle branch block

This study tests a new way to place a pacemaker lead inside the heart to help it beat more effectively, aiming to improve heart function and symptoms in people with heart failure and a specific electrical problem (left bundle branch block). If you meet the criteria, this could be an option to discuss with your heart doctor.

Nanchang, Jiangxi
NCT05769036Recruiting
Biventricular vs left bundle pacing for heart failure outcomes

This trial compares two types of heart pacing to see which improves outcomes for people with heart failure. It may help those who need pacing to better coordinate heartbeats and relieve symptoms.

Tomsk
NCT05815745Recruiting
Compare two heart pacing strategies for slow heart rhythm

This study compares two types of heart pacing—one that mainly targets the heart’s lower chambers versus one that targets the right side—to see which leads to better outcomes for people needing a pacemaker. It may help improve treatment for certain slow heart rhythm problems that require pacing.

Dublin
NCT06023784Recruiting
Comparing pacemaker leads to lower atrial fibrillation risk

This trial compares two pacing methods (LBBAP vs RVP) in people with heart block who need a pacemaker. It looks at whether one method reduces the chance of developing atrial fibrillation (a type of irregular heartbeat). To join, you must have a specific type of heart block, never had atrial fibrillation, and have a healthy pumping heart.

Beijing, Beijing Municipality
NCT07804394Not yet recruiting
Comparing two pacing targets for left bundle branch area pacemakers

This study compares two ways of pacing the heart during a left bundle branch area pacemaker procedure to see which gives better results. It is for people who need a pacemaker for a slow heartbeat and who are expected to need pacing frequently.

Hear when a new Pacemaker DDD trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.