Clin2
NCT05021601Possibly a fitRecruiting

Ablation method comparison for rheumatic valve and ongoing AF

Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Part of Heart & circulation clinical trials.

This study compares two heart procedures—targeting one or both upper heart chambers versus only the left upper chamber—to treat people with ongoing atrial fibrillation caused by rheumatic mitral valve disease. It aims to see which approach works better and is safer for restoring normal rhythm.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
320 people
Ages
18 years and older
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You are 18 years or older.
  • You have persistent or long-lasting persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) that has lasted more than 7 days or more than 1 year.
  • Your AF is related to rheumatic mitral valve disease, and you need mitral valve surgery for it.
  • You must be willing to undergo surgical ablation for AF as part of the study.
  • Your heart rhythm type is not paroxysmal AF (episodes that start and stop).

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07590661Not yet recruiting
Left Atrial Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

This study tests a heart rhythm procedure that uses electrical mapping to guide ablation (controlled scarring) of a specific area in the heart's left upper chamber to treat persistent atrial fibrillation—a condition where the heart beats irregularly for more than a week at a time. The goal is to see if this targeted approach helps restore normal heart rhythm.

Kunming, Yunnan
NCT07405359Recruiting
Comparing ablation methods for persistent atrial fibrillation

This trial tests a newer, possibly safer way to treat persistent atrial fibrillation using pulsed field ablation. It compares standard vein isolation alone to adding extra ablation spots to improve success.

San Francisco, California
NCT05776797Recruiting
Ablation vs best medicines for CRT patients with permanent atrial fibrillation

This trial compares two approaches—an AV junction ablation procedure versus continued best medical treatment—in people who already have a heart device for heart failure (CRT) but still have ongoing permanent atrial fibrillation. It aims to improve how well your heart rhythm is controlled and how effectively the device can pace your heart.

Liberec, Liberec Region
NCT06747091Recruiting
Ablation study for people with persistent atrial fibrillation

This trial tests a catheter ablation procedure for people with persistent atrial fibrillation (a type of irregular heartbeat that lasts more than 7 days but less than a year). It aims to see if the procedure is safe and effective for restoring a normal heart rhythm.

Manhasset, New York
NCT07633509Not yet recruiting
Combining treatments for long-standing atrial fibrillation

This study tests a new combination of treatments for people who have had atrial fibrillation (a type of irregular heartbeat) continuously for 1 to 3 years. The goal is to find a better way to restore normal heart rhythm and improve symptoms.

Beijing, Beijing Municipality
NCT06929897Enrolling by invitation
Comparing Two Ablation Methods for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

This study compares two types of ablation (a procedure that uses energy to fix irregular heartbeats) for people with persistent atrial fibrillation. It tests whether adding extra treatment to the back of the heart's left upper chamber helps improve outcomes compared to standard treatment alone.

Seoul

Hear when a new Persistent Atrial Fibrillation trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.