Comparing Two Ablation Methods for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Part of Heart & circulation clinical trials.
This study compares two types of ablation (a procedure that uses energy to fix irregular heartbeats) for people with persistent atrial fibrillation. It tests whether adding extra treatment to the back of the heart's left upper chamber helps improve outcomes compared to standard treatment alone.
Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.
Who can take part
- You are between 20 and 80 years old.
- You have persistent atrial fibrillation that has not been treated with catheter ablation in the past year.
- You do not have serious heart valve disease or very weak heart muscle (ejection fraction above 30%).
- You are able to take blood thinners and do not have active bleeding.
- You are in generally good health aside from AF, with no severe lung, kidney, or other organ problems.
Quick eligibility check
Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.
Similar studies
Other trials that look related to this one.
This study compares two techniques for treating persistent atrial fibrillation: one uses standard anatomy-based ablation, and the other uses a special mapping system to guide the procedure. It aims to find which method works better for people who have not had prior ablation.
This study compares two procedures to treat persistent atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat that lasts more than a week). It looks at whether a newer method (pulsed-field ablation) works better than the standard method (radiofrequency ablation), both combined with a chemical injection to improve treatment success.
This trial compares two catheter ablation techniques for people with persistent atrial fibrillation (a type of irregular heartbeat that doesn't go away on its own). It will test whether a more extensive ablation (burning more heart tissue) works better than the standard procedure of isolating the pulmonary veins (the veins that bring blood from the lungs to the heart). If you have this condition and have had at least one episode in the past year, this study might help you find a more effective treatment.
This trial compares different techniques for a second heart ablation procedure in people with atrial fibrillation (AFib) who have already had one ablation. It aims to find the best approach to stop AFib from coming back.
This study compares two extra ablation procedures done along with standard pulmonary vein isolation in people with persistent atrial fibrillation. Both aim to stop abnormal electrical signals that drive atrial fibrillation, and the study will see which approach is safer and more effective.
This trial compares two different ways of delivering pulsed field ablation—a newer, targeted energy that zaps abnormal heart tissue—for people with atrial fibrillation. It aims to see if a single broader application works as well as a more focused, two-step approach, and it may help you feel better if you have symptoms from this irregular heartbeat.
Hear when a new Atrial Fibrillation (AF) trial opens
We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.