Clin2
NCT05769114Possibly a fitRecruiting

Surgery vs non-surgery for a specific back fracture

SPINAL FractureBurst FractureSpinal Instability of Thoracolumbar Region

Part of Injuries & trauma clinical trials.

This study compares surgery and non-surgical care for an acute burst fracture in the middle-to-lower back. The goal is to see which approach works better for healing and recovery.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
52 people
Ages
18 years to 70 years
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You are between 18 and 70 years old
  • You have a recent (acute) traumatic burst fracture from T10 to L3 in your spine
  • You can give informed consent to join the study
  • You do not have nerve damage from the injury (no neurologic impairment in the ranges A to D)
  • Your fracture is not caused by weak bones (not a pathological fracture)

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07706439Not yet recruiting
Comparing treatments for spinal fractures from low-energy injuries

This study compares different ways to treat spinal compression fractures caused by low-energy injuries like falls. It looks at vertebroplasty, surgery, and wearing a brace with physical therapy to see which works best for people over 50.

La Tronche
NCT07071870Not yet recruiting
Comparing two minimally invasive treatments for unstable spine fractures

This study compares two ways to fix unstable spine fractures caused by osteoporosis. One is a newer, minimally invasive technique (called SAIF) and the other is standard spinal fusion surgery. The goal is to see which approach relieves pain and stabilizes the spine better with fewer side effects.

Lugano, Canton Ticino
NCT07645092Not yet recruiting
Study of bone cement and screws for a single spine fracture

This study reviews outcomes for people who had a certain surgery for a single broken vertebra in the mid-to-lower back. It aims to see how well the surgery works and if it is beneficial.

NCT07672184Not yet recruiting
Spine changes after treating mid-back fractures

This study compares how the spine changes over time after a fracture at the junction of the mid-back and lower back (thoracolumbar junction), whether treated with or without surgery. It aims to understand which treatment leads to better long-term spine health.

Moscow
NCT05701046Recruiting
Front vs back surgery for a slipped lower-back vertebra

This trial compares two surgical approaches—operating from the front/side versus from the back—for a specific type of lower-back slip called lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis. You may be eligible if you need surgery at a single level and have not had prior spine surgery, and if your back condition matches their exact limits.

Vancouver, British Columbia
NCT07516834Recruiting
Spine Surgery Recovery: Open vs. Minimally Invasive Approaches

This study compares how people recover their normal walking patterns after surgery for mid-to-lower spine fractures. Researchers will measure your gait (how you walk) and muscle activity to see if the type of surgery affects how quickly you heal.

Ústí nad Labem, Ústí nad Labem Region

Hear when a new SPINAL Fracture trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.