Comparing treatments for spinal fractures from low-energy injuries
Part of Bones, joints & muscles, Injuries & trauma, Pain clinical trials.
This study compares different ways to treat spinal compression fractures caused by low-energy injuries like falls. It looks at vertebroplasty, surgery, and wearing a brace with physical therapy to see which works best for people over 50.
Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.
Who can take part
- You are older than 50 and younger than 90.
- You have one or more spinal fractures between the mid-back and lower back (T7 to L5), confirmed by MRI.
- The fracture was caused by a low-energy event, like a fall from standing height.
- Your fracture is a certain type (A1.1, A1.2, or A1.3) as determined by your doctor.
- You are willing to follow the treatment plan your doctor recommends, which might include vertebroplasty, surgery, or a brace with physical therapy.
- You can understand and answer questions over the phone at the end of the study.
Quick eligibility check
Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.
Similar studies
Other trials that look related to this one.
This study tests a combination treatment for painful spinal fractures caused by thinning bones (osteoporosis) or tumors. It may help people with one or more recently broken vertebrae in the mid or lower back.
This study compares surgery and non-surgical care for an acute burst fracture in the middle-to-lower back. The goal is to see which approach works better for healing and recovery.
This trial tests a new device called VCFix to treat a single broken vertebra in the mid-to-lower back. It aims to see if the device is safe and effective for relieving pain and restoring spine function.
This study compares how the spine changes over time after a fracture at the junction of the mid-back and lower back (thoracolumbar junction), whether treated with or without surgery. It aims to understand which treatment leads to better long-term spine health.
This study compares two ways to fix unstable spine fractures caused by osteoporosis. One is a newer, minimally invasive technique (called SAIF) and the other is standard spinal fusion surgery. The goal is to see which approach relieves pain and stabilizes the spine better with fewer side effects.
This trial compares a procedure called vertebroplasty (injecting bone cement into the broken bone) with a sham (fake) procedure to see how it affects your ability to move and be active. It's for people with recent painful spinal fractures caused by weak bones (osteoporosis).
Hear when a new Thoracolumbar Low-energy Vertebral Compression Fractures trial opens
We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.