Clin2
NCT07516834Possibly a fitRecruiting

Spine Surgery Recovery: Open vs. Minimally Invasive Approaches

Spine Fracture

Part of Injuries & trauma clinical trials.

This study compares how people recover their normal walking patterns after surgery for mid-to-lower spine fractures. Researchers will measure your gait (how you walk) and muscle activity to see if the type of surgery affects how quickly you heal.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
20 people
Ages
20 years to 75 years
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You have a fracture in your mid-back or lower-back spine that needs surgical stabilization (reinforcement)
  • You do not have nerve damage or paralysis from your spine injury
  • You are willing to undergo gait analysis and muscle activity testing after your surgery
  • You can participate in follow-up assessments to track your walking recovery over time

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07672184Not yet recruiting
Spine changes after treating mid-back fractures

This study compares how the spine changes over time after a fracture at the junction of the mid-back and lower back (thoracolumbar junction), whether treated with or without surgery. It aims to understand which treatment leads to better long-term spine health.

Moscow
NCT05769114Recruiting
Surgery vs non-surgery for a specific back fracture

This study compares surgery and non-surgical care for an acute burst fracture in the middle-to-lower back. The goal is to see which approach works better for healing and recovery.

Bern
NCT07071870Not yet recruiting
Comparing two minimally invasive treatments for unstable spine fractures

This study compares two ways to fix unstable spine fractures caused by osteoporosis. One is a newer, minimally invasive technique (called SAIF) and the other is standard spinal fusion surgery. The goal is to see which approach relieves pain and stabilizes the spine better with fewer side effects.

Lugano, Canton Ticino
NCT06736106Recruiting
Spine surgery recovery markers study

This trial looks at how certain markers of bone and muscle health might predict complications after spinal surgery. It could help doctors better understand which patients are at risk and improve recovery.

Bologna
NCT07534579Not yet recruiting
Open vs. minimally invasive surgery for unstable sacral fractures

This study compares two surgical methods for fixing unstable fractures of the sacrum (the bone at the base of the spine). It aims to see if a less invasive approach works as well as traditional open surgery, potentially leading to faster recovery and fewer complications.

NCT07706439Not yet recruiting
Comparing treatments for spinal fractures from low-energy injuries

This study compares different ways to treat spinal compression fractures caused by low-energy injuries like falls. It looks at vertebroplasty, surgery, and wearing a brace with physical therapy to see which works best for people over 50.

La Tronche

Hear when a new Spine Fracture trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.