Clin2
NCT06096246Possibly a fitRecruiting

Comparing treatments for persistent atrial fibrillation

Persistent Atrial FibrillationCardiac ArrhythmiaCatheter Ablation

Part of Heart & circulation clinical trials.

This study compares two treatments for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) that lasts more than 7 days but less than 2 years: electrical cardioversion (a shock to reset your heart rhythm) versus catheter ablation (using radio waves to fix the heart's electrical pathways). It aims to find which option works better for patients like you.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
208 people
Ages
18 years to 85 years
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You are between 18 and 85 years old.
  • You have atrial fibrillation that has lasted continuously for more than 7 days but less than 2 years.
  • Your doctor has already talked to you about having a cardioversion.
  • You must be willing and able to take blood thinners (anticoagulation) to prevent clots.
  • Your kidneys are working well (eGFR above 30).

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07815171Not yet recruiting
Comparing two ablation catheters for persistent atrial fibrillation

This study compares two different catheters used in ablation procedures to treat persistent atrial fibrillation, a type of irregular heartbeat that lasts for weeks or months. The goal is to find out which catheter is more effective at restoring normal rhythm, and you will receive a small monitor under your skin to track your heart for a year.

Paris
NCT05723536Recruiting
Comparing two procedures for persistent atrial fibrillation

This study compares two ways to treat persistent atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat that lasts for a long time). One method uses a catheter to treat the heart from the inside, and the other combines that with a small procedure on the outside of the heart. The goal is to see which approach works better for people whose symptoms haven't improved with medication.

Barcelona
NCT06791629Not yet recruiting
Comparing two ablation methods for persistent atrial fibrillation

This trial compares two ways to treat persistent atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat that lasts for months or years). One method uses pulsed field energy and the other uses radiofrequency heat to fix the heart's electrical signals. The goal is to see which method is safer and more effective for patients having their first ablation procedure.

Beijing
NCT06747091Recruiting
Ablation study for people with persistent atrial fibrillation

This trial tests a catheter ablation procedure for people with persistent atrial fibrillation (a type of irregular heartbeat that lasts more than 7 days but less than a year). It aims to see if the procedure is safe and effective for restoring a normal heart rhythm.

Manhasset, New York
NCT07405359Recruiting
Comparing ablation methods for persistent atrial fibrillation

This trial tests a newer, possibly safer way to treat persistent atrial fibrillation using pulsed field ablation. It compares standard vein isolation alone to adding extra ablation spots to improve success.

San Francisco, California
NCT07106970Recruiting
Comparing two ablation approaches for persistent atrial fibrillation

This trial tests whether adding extra ablation lines to the standard pulmonary vein isolation procedure is more effective for people with persistent atrial fibrillation that hasn't been helped by medications. The goal is to improve symptoms like palpitations, fatigue, and shortness of breath.

Beijing

Hear when a new Persistent Atrial Fibrillation trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.