Comparing two ablation approaches for persistent atrial fibrillation
Part of Heart & circulation clinical trials.
This trial tests whether adding extra ablation lines to the standard pulmonary vein isolation procedure is more effective for people with persistent atrial fibrillation that hasn't been helped by medications. The goal is to improve symptoms like palpitations, fatigue, and shortness of breath.
Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.
Who can take part
- You are between 18 and 80 years old.
- You have persistent atrial fibrillation that has lasted more than 90 days and is causing symptoms.
- You have tried at least one heart rhythm medication that didn't work or caused side effects.
- This would be your first ablation procedure for atrial fibrillation.
- You do not have certain other heart conditions, recent strokes, or serious kidney problems.
Quick eligibility check
Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.
Similar studies
Other trials that look related to this one.
This trial compares two ways to treat persistent atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat that lasts for months or years). One method uses pulsed field energy and the other uses radiofrequency heat to fix the heart's electrical signals. The goal is to see which method is safer and more effective for patients having their first ablation procedure.
This trial tests a newer, possibly safer way to treat persistent atrial fibrillation using pulsed field ablation. It compares standard vein isolation alone to adding extra ablation spots to improve success.
This trial tests a more precise way to burn (ablate) the back wall of the left upper heart chamber during the first ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). It aims to improve heart rhythm control and reduce the chance of AF coming back.
This study compares two different catheters used in ablation procedures to treat persistent atrial fibrillation, a type of irregular heartbeat that lasts for weeks or months. The goal is to find out which catheter is more effective at restoring normal rhythm, and you will receive a small monitor under your skin to track your heart for a year.
This study compares two ways to treat persistent atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat that lasts for a long time). One method uses a catheter to treat the heart from the inside, and the other combines that with a small procedure on the outside of the heart. The goal is to see which approach works better for people whose symptoms haven't improved with medication.
This study tests a new way to fix atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat) by burning a small area in the upper heart to prevent the irregular signals from starting. It compares two methods to see if adding a small extra step helps the heart stay in a normal rhythm longer.
Hear when a new Persistent Atrial Fibrillation trial opens
We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.