Clin2
NCT06279663Possibly a fitRecruiting

Comparing bypass surgery vs stenting for high-risk heart attacks

Coronary Syndrome, Acute, Non-ST Elevation, High Risk Patients

Part of Heart & circulation, Pain clinical trials.

This study compares two common treatments (bypass surgery vs. stenting) for people having a high-risk heart attack that involves blockages in multiple arteries. It aims to find which approach leads to better long-term outcomes.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
460 people
Ages
18 years and older
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You are having a type of heart attack (without ST elevation) that is considered high risk, meaning your doctor wants to restore blood flow within 24 hours.
  • You have blockages in several heart arteries and your doctor believes both bypass surgery (CABG) and stenting (PCI) are possible options for you.
  • You have not had a stent or heart bypass surgery in the past year.
  • Your heart's pumping strength is at least 40% (measured by an echocardiogram).
  • You have not had a bleeding stroke in the last year or a stroke or mini-stroke in the last 6 weeks.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT05534698Not yet recruiting
Compare bypass surgery and stent treatment in high-risk heart patients

This study is testing which treatment—coronary bypass surgery (CABG) or stents via catheter (PCI)—is better for people at higher risk due to weaker heart pumping. A heart team must think either option could meaningfully help you.

Copenhagen
NCT06399705Recruiting· Phase 3
Comparing bypass surgery vs stenting for minority heart patients

This trial compares two common heart procedures—bypass surgery and stenting—for people with multiple blocked arteries. It focuses on minority groups to find out which treatment works best for them. You will be asked to fill out quality-of-life questionnaires for up to 10 years.

Glendale, California
NCT05532631Recruiting
Compare stent procedure versus bypass surgery for weak heart

This study compares two ways to improve blood flow to the heart—using stents through a catheter or bypass surgery—in people with heart muscle weakness and blockages in more than one coronary artery. It may help identify which approach leads to better outcomes over at least two years.

Créteil, Val De Marne
NCT05427370Recruiting
Compare bypass or stent treatment in weak heart patients

This study compares two ways to restore blood flow to the heart—bypass surgery (CABG) or stent procedure (PCI)—in people with a weak pumping heart. It looks at which approach works best when the heart muscle is not pumping well and there are multiple blocked heart arteries.

Los Angeles, California
NCT07020195Not yet recruiting
Comparing stents vs bypass for multivessel heart disease

This trial compares two ways to treat blocked heart arteries: stents (threaded through a blood vessel) or bypass surgery. It uses a special computer program (QFR) that analyzes blood flow from your angiogram pictures to help decide which treatment is best for you.

NCT05329285Recruiting
Compare bypass or stent for heart weakness from blocked arteries

This study compares two ways to improve blood flow in people with weakened heart pumping (ischemic cardiomyopathy): bypass surgery (CABG) versus stent treatment (PCI). It aims to see which approach works better when the heart still has enough at-risk muscle and when best medical therapy is already started.

Gothenburg

Hear when a new Coronary Syndrome, Acute, Non-ST Elevation, High Risk Patients trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.