Clin2
NCT06381167Possibly a fitNot yet recruiting

Camera vs. microscoping decompression for lower back narrowing

Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Part of Bones, joints & muscles clinical trials.

This trial compares two ways of relieving pressure on nerves in the lower back: one using a small camera (endoscope) and the other using a microscope. It aims to find which approach helps people with narrowing in one or two spots of the lower spine feel better and recover faster.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
52 people
Ages
40 years and older
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You must be at least 40 years old.
  • You have narrowing in your lower spine (lumbar stenosis) that developed over time, not from an injury.
  • The narrowing is in only one or two separate spots in your lower spine.
  • You have not had any back surgery before.
  • You do not have other spine problems like a fracture, infection, tumor, or conditions such as ankylosing spondylitis.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT06719037Recruiting
Comparing two spine surgeries for lower back narrowing

This study compares two different surgical techniques – one using a small camera (endoscopic discectomy) and the other a traditional open approach (microdiscectomy) – to treat narrowing in the lower spine. It helps find which method may be better for relieving pain and improving function.

Jinan, Shandong
NCT07281625Recruiting· Early Phase 1
Comparing two types of back surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis

This study compares two surgical approaches for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (a narrowing of the spine that puts pressure on nerves). One group will get standard decompression (relieving pressure), the other group will get that plus screws and rods to stabilize the spine. The goal is to see which leads to better outcomes.

Lahore, Punjab Province
NCT07026305Recruiting
Comparing surgical approaches for lumbar spinal stenosis

This study is comparing two surgical approaches for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (narrowing of the lower spine). It aims to see if a less invasive surgery works as well as a more extensive procedure, which may help patients recover faster.

Madrid
NCT07588555Recruiting
Two surgical approaches for lumbar spine narrowing

This trial compares two slightly different surgical techniques for treating lumbar spinal stenosis (a narrowing of the spinal canal that causes leg pain). Both procedures fuse one level of your spine to relieve pain, but use slightly different approaches through the side of the spine.

Guangzhou, Guangdong
NCT05273879Recruiting
Testing whether one-level fusion is needed after lumbar decompression

This trial compares outcomes after decompression surgery for one affected area in the lower back, with and without adding spinal fusion. It may help patients avoid unnecessary extra surgery—or ensure fusion is used when it’s needed.

Moscow, Moscow
NCT06749314Not yet recruiting
Comparing two minimally invasive back surgeries for spinal slippage

This study compares two types of minimally invasive back surgery for patients with a single slipped vertebra in the lower back that hasn't improved with other treatments. It aims to find out which procedure—endoscopic decompression or MIS-TLIF (a fusion technique)—provides better relief and recovery.

Chon Buri

Hear when a new Lumbar Spinal Stenosis trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.