Comparing two spine surgeries for lower back narrowing
Part of Bones, joints & muscles clinical trials.
This study compares two different surgical techniques – one using a small camera (endoscopic discectomy) and the other a traditional open approach (microdiscectomy) – to treat narrowing in the lower spine. It helps find which method may be better for relieving pain and improving function.
Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.
Who can take part
- You have narrowing in just one area of your lower spine (single-level lumbar spinal stenosis).
- Your leg or back symptoms match what shows up on your MRI or CT scan.
- You have tried at least 3 months of non-surgical treatments (like physical therapy or medicine) without enough relief.
- You and your family understand and agree to the risks of surgery.
- You have not had previous back surgery, and you do not have other serious spine problems like tumors or deformities.
Quick eligibility check
Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.
Similar studies
Other trials that look related to this one.
This trial compares two ways of relieving pressure on nerves in the lower back: one using a small camera (endoscope) and the other using a microscope. It aims to find which approach helps people with narrowing in one or two spots of the lower spine feel better and recover faster.
This study compares two surgical approaches for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (a narrowing of the spine that puts pressure on nerves). One group will get standard decompression (relieving pressure), the other group will get that plus screws and rods to stabilize the spine. The goal is to see which leads to better outcomes.
This trial compares two slightly different surgical techniques for treating lumbar spinal stenosis (a narrowing of the spinal canal that causes leg pain). Both procedures fuse one level of your spine to relieve pain, but use slightly different approaches through the side of the spine.
This study is comparing two surgical approaches for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (narrowing of the lower spine). It aims to see if a less invasive surgery works as well as a more extensive procedure, which may help patients recover faster.
This study compares two types of minimally invasive back surgery for patients with a single slipped vertebra in the lower back that hasn't improved with other treatments. It aims to find out which procedure—endoscopic decompression or MIS-TLIF (a fusion technique)—provides better relief and recovery.
This trial compares two minimally invasive spine surgeries for single-level spinal stenosis. It aims to see which procedure better relieves leg pain and improves walking ability in patients aged 50-75 who have not improved with non-surgical treatments.
Hear when a new Lumbar Spinal Stenosis trial opens
We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.