Clin2
NCT06719037Worth exploringRecruiting

Comparing two spine surgeries for lower back narrowing

Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Part of Bones, joints & muscles clinical trials.

This study compares two different surgical techniques – one using a small camera (endoscopic discectomy) and the other a traditional open approach (microdiscectomy) – to treat narrowing in the lower spine. It helps find which method may be better for relieving pain and improving function.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
324 people
Ages
18 years to 80 years
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You have narrowing in just one area of your lower spine (single-level lumbar spinal stenosis).
  • Your leg or back symptoms match what shows up on your MRI or CT scan.
  • You have tried at least 3 months of non-surgical treatments (like physical therapy or medicine) without enough relief.
  • You and your family understand and agree to the risks of surgery.
  • You have not had previous back surgery, and you do not have other serious spine problems like tumors or deformities.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07281625Recruiting· Early Phase 1
Comparing two types of back surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis

This study compares two surgical approaches for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (a narrowing of the spine that puts pressure on nerves). One group will get standard decompression (relieving pressure), the other group will get that plus screws and rods to stabilize the spine. The goal is to see which leads to better outcomes.

Lahore, Punjab Province
NCT06749314Not yet recruiting
Comparing two types of back surgery for a common spine condition

This study compares two minimally invasive surgical methods for treating a type of lower back problem where one spinal bone slips forward over another. The goal is to see which approach gives better pain relief and function, helping you choose the best option.

Chon Buri
NCT06381167Not yet recruiting
Camera versus microscope decompression for lower back stenosis

This study compares two surgeries to relieve pressure on the spinal nerves in the lower back (lumbar stenosis). Both use small tools, but one uses a tiny camera (endoscopic) and the other uses a microscope, to help improve pain and walking.

NCT07588555Recruiting
Two surgical approaches for lumbar spine narrowing

This trial compares two slightly different surgical techniques for treating lumbar spinal stenosis (a narrowing of the spinal canal that causes leg pain). Both procedures fuse one level of your spine to relieve pain, but use slightly different approaches through the side of the spine.

Guangzhou, Guangdong
NCT07026305Recruiting
Comparing surgical approaches for lumbar spinal stenosis

This study is comparing two surgical approaches for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (narrowing of the lower spine). It aims to see if a less invasive surgery works as well as a more extensive procedure, which may help patients recover faster.

Madrid
NCT06722859Not yet recruiting
Comparing two surgical approaches for lumbar spinal stenosis

This study compares two types of surgery to relieve pressure on the nerves in your lower back caused by narrowing of the spinal canal. One is a traditional open surgery, and the other is a microsurgery using a microscope for a smaller incision. Both aim to reduce pain and improve function.

Hear when a new Lumbar Spinal Stenosis trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.