Clin2
NCT06545864Possibly a fitNot yet recruiting

Comparing clot-busting medicine versus catheter treatment for serious lung blood clot

Acute Pulmonary Embolism

Part of Blood & lymphatic, Heart & circulation, Lungs & breathing clinical trials.

This study compares two ways to treat a serious pulmonary embolism (a blood clot in the lungs): using clot-busting medicine delivered through an IV, or using a catheter (a thin tube) to guide treatment directly to the clot. The goal is to find which approach works better and is safer for people at intermediate-high risk.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
50 people
Ages
18 years and older
Study type
Observational

Who can take part

  • You have been diagnosed with a pulmonary embolism (a blood clot in the lungs) that is considered 'intermediate-high risk' — meaning it is serious but not immediately life-threatening.
  • You are 18 years old or older.
  • You do not have masses (abnormal growths) in your heart that could complicate treatment.
  • You are willing to accept either treatment approach being tested.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07869875Not yet recruiting
Comparing three catheter treatments for acute pulmonary embolism

This trial tests three ways of using a catheter (a thin tube) to remove or break up blood clots in the lungs for people with a serious but stable type of pulmonary embolism. The goal is to find the best approach to improve recovery and reduce complications.

NCT07032025Not yet recruiting· Early Phase 1
Clot removal procedure for acute pulmonary embolism

This trial tests a procedure to remove blood clots from the lungs using a tube (catheter) to open blocked vessels. It may help people with a sudden pulmonary embolism who are stable enough to undergo the procedure.

NCT07865572Not yet recruiting
Clot removal with or without clot-dissolving medicine for pulmonary embolism

This trial tests two ways to treat a serious blood clot in the lungs: removing the clot with a small tube (catheter) alone, or combining that with a low dose of clot-dissolving medicine. The goal is to find a safer and effective treatment for people who can't have standard clot-busting treatment.

NCT07003646Recruiting
Treating acute pulmonary embolism with clot-dissolving or catheter procedures

This study looks at how well different treatments work for a blood clot in the lung (pulmonary embolism). It includes people who are getting or have already gotten a clot-dissolving medicine or a catheter procedure to remove the clot.

Aarhus
NCT07603700Not yet recruiting
Comparing treatments for a serious type of blood clot in the lungs

This study compares different real-world treatments for a serious but stable type of blood clot in the lungs (called intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism). It aims to see which treatments work best in everyday patients, including those with other health conditions.

Nanjing, Jiangsu
NCT06348459Recruiting
Catheter treatment for severe pulmonary embolism

This study looks at how well a catheter (a thin tube) works to treat a serious type of blood clot in the lungs. It is for people who have a large clot that is causing problems like fast heart rate or low blood pressure.

Madrid, Madrid

Hear when a new Acute Pulmonary Embolism trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.