Clin2
NCT06686407Likely a fitNot yet recruiting

Comparing treatments for lower back nerve compression

Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis

Part of Bones, joints & muscles, Pain clinical trials.

This study compares different ways to treat narrowing of the nerve openings in the lower back, which can cause pain and weakness in the legs. The goal is to find which treatment works best for people like you.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
32 people
Ages
18 years and older
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You have been diagnosed with narrowing of the nerve openings in your lower back (lumbar foraminal stenosis) caused by wear and tear.
  • You are over 18 years old.
  • You do not have a significant spinal deformity like scoliosis.
  • You do not have an infection in your spine.
  • You do not have a tumor in your spine.
  • You do not have spinal instability (abnormal movement between the bones).

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT06722859Not yet recruiting
Comparing two surgical approaches for lumbar spinal stenosis

This study compares two types of surgery to relieve pressure on the nerves in your lower back caused by narrowing of the spinal canal. One is a traditional open surgery, and the other is a microsurgery using a microscope for a smaller incision. Both aim to reduce pain and improve function.

NCT06685575Enrolling by invitation
Comparing two types of back surgery for leg pain

This trial compares a newer, less invasive surgery (endoscopic foraminotomy) to a traditional back surgery for people with leg pain caused by a narrowed spine canal. The goal is to see which approach provides better relief and recovery.

Chon Buri, Changwat Chon Buri
NCT07279051Not yet recruiting
Comparing two back surgery methods for spinal stenosis

This trial compares two surgical techniques for treating lumbar spinal stenosis, a condition that can cause leg pain and numbness. The goal is to see if a less invasive method works as well as the traditional approach, potentially leading to a quicker recovery.

NCT07281625Recruiting· Early Phase 1
Comparing two types of back surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis

This study compares two surgical approaches for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (a narrowing of the spine that puts pressure on nerves). One group will get standard decompression (relieving pressure), the other group will get that plus screws and rods to stabilize the spine. The goal is to see which leads to better outcomes.

Lahore, Punjab Province
NCT07482826Not yet recruiting
Two types of minimally invasive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in adults 50-75

This study compares two types of minimally invasive spinal surgery for older adults with lumbar spinal stenosis (a condition that narrows the spinal canal and can cause leg pain and difficulty walking). The goal is to see if one approach—relieving pressure alone or also fusing (joining) the bones—works better for relieving pain and improving function.

NCT07670533Not yet recruiting
Treatment options for narrowing above a past back fusion

This study compares two treatments for people who have narrowing of the spine above a previous back fusion. One option is just removing the pressure on the nerves, and the other is also extending the fusion. It aims to see which works better for symptoms like leg pain or cramping when walking.

Gjøvik

Hear when a new Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.