Clin2
NCT06685575Possibly a fitEnrolling by invitation

Comparing two types of back surgery for leg pain

Foraminal Stenosis

Part of Bones, joints & muscles, Pain clinical trials.

This trial compares a newer, less invasive surgery (endoscopic foraminotomy) to a traditional back surgery for people with leg pain caused by a narrowed spine canal. The goal is to see which approach provides better relief and recovery.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
52 people
Ages
30 years to 80 years
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You are between 30 and 80 years old
  • You have ongoing leg pain (sciatica) due to a stable narrowing of the spine
  • You have tried at least 6 months of non-surgical treatments (like physical therapy or medication) without success
  • You have not had previous back surgery with metal implants
  • You are willing to participate in the study

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT06749314Not yet recruiting
Comparing two minimally invasive back surgeries for spinal slippage

This study compares two types of minimally invasive back surgery for patients with a single slipped vertebra in the lower back that hasn't improved with other treatments. It aims to find out which procedure—endoscopic decompression or MIS-TLIF (a fusion technique)—provides better relief and recovery.

Chon Buri
NCT06686407Not yet recruiting
Comparing treatments for lumbar foraminal stenosis

This study compares different ways to treat a specific type of lower back pain caused by narrowed nerve passages in the spine. It may help if you have this condition and are looking for the best treatment option.

NCT07482826Not yet recruiting
Spine Surgery Comparison for Older Adults with Spinal Stenosis

This trial compares two minimally invasive spine surgeries for single-level spinal stenosis. It aims to see which procedure better relieves leg pain and improves walking ability in patients aged 50-75 who have not improved with non-surgical treatments.

NCT07281625Recruiting· Early Phase 1
Comparing two types of back surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis

This study compares two surgical approaches for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (a narrowing of the spine that puts pressure on nerves). One group will get standard decompression (relieving pressure), the other group will get that plus screws and rods to stabilize the spine. The goal is to see which leads to better outcomes.

Lahore, Punjab Province
NCT07045714Recruiting
Endoscopic back surgery for spinal stenosis

This study looks at a newer, less invasive type of back surgery called endoscopic laminotomy. It may help people with lumbar spinal stenosis (narrowing of the spinal canal) who still have leg or back pain after trying physical therapy and pain medicines for at least 3 months.

San Pedro Garza García, Nuevo León
NCT07279051Not yet recruiting
Comparing a less invasive vs traditional back surgery for spinal stenosis

This trial compares a newer, smaller-incision back surgery (modified mini-open TLIF) to the standard open surgery for people with lumbar spinal stenosis that hasn't improved with non-surgical treatments like physical therapy or medications. The goal is to see if the less invasive approach works as well or better with quicker recovery.

Hear when a new Foraminal Stenosis trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.