Comparing repeat ablation methods for atrial fibrillation
Part of Heart & circulation clinical trials.
This trial compares different techniques for a second heart ablation procedure in people with atrial fibrillation (AFib) who have already had one ablation. It aims to find the best approach to stop AFib from coming back.
Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.
Who can take part
- You must be 18 or older.
- You have had one prior ablation for persistent AFib at least 3 months ago.
- You still have symptomatic AFib (coming and going or persistent) confirmed on an ECG.
- You are willing to have another ablation and follow all study requirements.
- You do not have serious heart conditions like very low heart function, large left atrium, recent heart attack or stroke, or need for dialysis.
Quick eligibility check
Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.
Similar studies
Other trials that look related to this one.
This study compares two extra ablation procedures done along with standard pulmonary vein isolation in people with persistent atrial fibrillation. Both aim to stop abnormal electrical signals that drive atrial fibrillation, and the study will see which approach is safer and more effective.
This study compares two types of ablation (a procedure that uses energy to fix irregular heartbeats) for people with persistent atrial fibrillation. It tests whether adding extra treatment to the back of the heart's left upper chamber helps improve outcomes compared to standard treatment alone.
This study compares two ways of doing a repeat heart procedure for atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat). It tests whether adding extra ablation (using energy to destroy small areas of heart tissue) on the back wall of the heart's upper left chamber helps prevent the irregular heartbeat from coming back.
This trial compares two catheter ablation techniques for people with persistent atrial fibrillation (a type of irregular heartbeat that doesn't go away on its own). It will test whether a more extensive ablation (burning more heart tissue) works better than the standard procedure of isolating the pulmonary veins (the veins that bring blood from the lungs to the heart). If you have this condition and have had at least one episode in the past year, this study might help you find a more effective treatment.
This study compares two treatments for people with atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat) that keeps coming back after a previous ablation. One treatment is a repeat ablation, and the other is a pacemaker plus a procedure called AV node ablation to control the heart rate. The study aims to see which approach works better.
This study compares two procedures to treat persistent atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat that lasts more than a week). It looks at whether a newer method (pulsed-field ablation) works better than the standard method (radiofrequency ablation), both combined with a chemical injection to improve treatment success.
Hear when a new Atrial Fibrillation (AF) trial opens
We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.