Clin2
NCT07534579Possibly a fitNot yet recruiting

Open vs. minimally invasive surgery for unstable sacral fractures

Sacral FracturesTraumatic Unstable Sacral FracturesSpinopelvic DissociationPelvic Ring Injuries

Part of Bones, joints & muscles, Injuries & trauma clinical trials.

This study compares two surgical methods for fixing unstable fractures of the sacrum (the bone at the base of the spine). It aims to see if a less invasive approach works as well as traditional open surgery, potentially leading to faster recovery and fewer complications.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
60 people
Ages
18 years and older
Study type
Observational

Who can take part

  • You must be 18 years or older at the time of your injury and surgery.
  • You must have a confirmed unstable fracture of the sacrum, which includes certain types of fractures or a pelvic ring injury involving the sacrum.
  • You must have had surgery using a specific technique called lumbopelvic fixation (either open or minimally invasive) between 2016 and 2024.
  • Your medical records must be complete, including imaging (X-rays or CT scans) and operative notes.
  • You must have had at least 12 months of follow-up after surgery.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT05683314Recruiting
Surgery comparison for unstable pelvic and hip socket fractures

This study looks at how to best surgically fix unstable pelvic and acetabular (hip socket) fractures, comparing different operative approaches. You might benefit if your goal is stable healing with a less invasive internal fixation method, but the study requires specific fracture types and long follow-up time.

Taichung, North District
NCT06550934Not yet recruiting
Comparing two surgical approaches for pelvic fractures in older adults

This study compares two surgical methods for treating pelvic fractures in older adults caused by low-energy events like falls. It aims to see if one approach leads to better recovery, helping guide future treatment decisions.

NCT07071870Not yet recruiting
Comparing two minimally invasive treatments for unstable spine fractures

This study compares two ways to fix unstable spine fractures caused by osteoporosis. One is a newer, minimally invasive technique (called SAIF) and the other is standard spinal fusion surgery. The goal is to see which approach relieves pain and stabilizes the spine better with fewer side effects.

Lugano, Canton Ticino
NCT07493564Not yet recruiting
Sacroplasty for sacral insufficiency fractures

This trial tests a procedure called sacroplasty, which injects bone cement into a broken sacrum (the base of the spine) to relieve pain from a fracture caused by low-energy injury. It may help reduce pain and improve function for people with recent fractures.

Hull, East Yorkshire
NCT07351123Recruiting
Pelvic fracture treatment study for older adults

This study compares different ways to treat a specific type of pelvic fracture in adults 60 and older. It aims to find which treatment works best for healing and recovery.

Baltimore, Maryland
NCT07209280Enrolling by invitation
New screw system for pelvic fracture repair

This trial tests a newer type of screw to fix certain pelvic fractures. It aims to see if it works better than the standard screw for helping bones heal and for you to get back on your feet.

Salt Lake City, Utah

Hear when a new Sacral Fractures trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.