Flexible vs. rigid scope for diagnosing lung fluid
Part of Lungs & breathing clinical trials.
This trial compares two types of camera-assisted procedures (thoracoscopy) to diagnose fluid buildup around the lung. One uses a flexible instrument, the other a rigid one, to see which is better at finding the cause.
Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.
Who can take part
- You are 18 years old or older
- You have fluid on one side of your lung that doctors haven't been able to diagnose with simpler tests
- You are willing to sign a consent form after understanding the study
- Your lung is not completely stuck to the chest wall (no pleural symphysis)
- You do not have a severe cough that won't go away
- You are not mostly bedridden or unable to care for yourself
Quick eligibility check
Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.
Similar studies
Other trials that look related to this one.
This study compares two ways to get a tissue sample from the lining of your lung to find out why you have fluid in your chest. The first method uses a special ultrasound to guide the biopsy, and the second uses a small camera (a thoracoscope). If ultrasound-guided biopsy doesn't give enough tissue, patients get the camera procedure anyway.
This trial tests a new device to wash out fluid that stays in the chest after a chest tube is placed. It might help people who cannot receive standard medication to break up this fluid within the first day after their chest tube is inserted.
This trial compares a new type of telescope (dual-function) with the standard telescope to see which one better diagnoses the cause of fluid around the lung. It may help you get a faster, more accurate diagnosis.
This study tests whether a thin, flexible tube (like a small camera) can safely and effectively help doctors get tissue samples from fluid around the lung. It compares a single-use flexible tool to a standard semi-rigid scope, and may help find the cause of your lung fluid.
This trial compares two approaches to diagnosing fluid around the lung that may be caused by cancer: starting with a camera scope (pleuroscopy) versus starting with a needle drainage (thoracentesis). It aims to see which method leads to a quicker and clearer diagnosis.
This study tests whether a minimally invasive camera procedure (thoracoscopy) combined with special medications helps treat serious infections in the space around your lungs. The goal is to see if this approach works better than standard drainage alone.
Hear when a new Pleural Effusion Disorder trial opens
We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.