Exoskeleton vs. Lead Apron for Surgeon Protection During Aortic Repair
Part of Bones, joints & muscles, Heart & circulation clinical trials.
This study compares a new exoskeleton device (a wearable support system) to standard lead aprons for protecting surgeons from radiation during endovascular aortic repair procedures—a minimally invasive surgery to fix problems in the main artery in the abdomen. The trial tests whether the exoskeleton provides better protection and comfort.
Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.
Who can take part
- You must be a vascular surgeon (a doctor who specializes in blood vessel surgery) with significant experience performing endovascular procedures
- You must actively participate in endovascular aortic repair procedures as either the primary surgeon or an assistant
- You must have a high volume of endovascular procedures in your practice
- You must be at least 35 years old
- You must be able to provide written informed consent and understand the study procedures
- You cannot have medical conditions that would make wearing a lead apron or exoskeleton unsafe for you
Quick eligibility check
Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.
Similar studies
Other trials that look related to this one.
This study tests a new way to guide a complex aortic surgery (fenestrated endovascular repair) using less or no radiation. It may help people with aneurysms who need repair involving the arteries that supply the liver, gut and kidneys.
This trial tests a new technology that may help doctors place a guide wire more easily during a standard procedure to repair an abdominal aortic aneurysm (a bulging, weakened area in the main artery in the belly). It aims to see if this technology makes the procedure safer or more effective for patients.
This study compares two ways to treat an abdominal aortic aneurysm (a bulge in the lower part of the aorta). It looks at whether the newer approach works as well as standard EVAR in people whose aneurysm has a wider neck that may be harder to treat.
This study tests a new lightweight radiation protection garment for staff who work in interventional radiology. It aims to see if it is as safe and comfortable as the standard heavy lead aprons.
This trial compares two procedures (ESAR and FEVAR) to repair an abdominal aortic aneurysm in people whose anatomy makes the usual repair hard. It may help find a safer, more durable option for patients with challenging aortic neck features.
This study tests a new way to repair a complex aortic aneurysm (a bulge in the main artery) using a special procedure that helps keep blood flowing to your vital organs. It may help people who are not candidates for standard surgery. The goal is to see if this approach is safe and works well.
Hear when a new Endovascular Aortic Repair trial opens
We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.