Comparing two methods for making dental splints
Part of Injuries & trauma clinical trials.
This study compares two ways of making custom mouthguards (splints) for teeth grinding or jaw clenching. One method uses a digital scan; the other uses a traditional wax bite. The goal is to see which is more accurate, which could lead to better-fitting and more comfortable splints.
Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.
Who can take part
- You are between 18 and 45 years old.
- You are generally healthy (with mild to moderate health issues allowed).
- You have a complete set of natural teeth (missing wisdom teeth or teeth removed for braces are fine).
- You do not have active dental disease like cavities or gum disease.
- You are not allergic to acrylic materials, have no severe allergies, and are not pregnant or breastfeeding.
Quick eligibility check
Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.
Similar studies
Other trials that look related to this one.
This study compares two types of bite splints—one made with digital technology and one made the traditional way—to see how they distribute biting forces. It may help people who grind or clench their teeth find a more effective splint.
This study compares two ways of making a dental splint (a mouthguard-like device) for people with jaw joint pain or muscle pain. The goal is to see which method requires fewer adjustments, which may mean fewer visits and less discomfort for you.
This study compares two ways of making a custom bite splint for jaw pain: one made the traditional way with molds, and one made using computer scanning and 3D printing. Both splints are designed to relieve muscle and joint pain in the jaw area, and the goal is to see which method works better.
This study compares two ways of making mouth guards (splints) for people with jaw joint or muscle pain. It aims to see which method patients are more satisfied with.
This trial compares a new 3D-printed splint with a standard acrylic splint for treating teeth grinding (bruxism) and jaw joint problems. Participants wear the splint at night for 3 months to see which type works better.
This study compares two types of mouth splints (one made with digital technology and one made the traditional way) for people with temporomandibular joint (jaw joint) discomfort. The goal is to see which splint works better and whether either affects tooth wear.
Hear when a new Occlusion trial opens
We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.