Clin2
NCT05812963Possibly a fitRecruiting

IVUS vs FFR to guide stents after heart attacks

ST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionNon-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Part of Heart & circulation clinical trials.

This trial compares two ways of measuring blood flow inside the heart arteries (IVUS vs FFR) to help decide which non–culprit artery narrowings need a stent after a recent heart attack. It may help doctors choose the best targets for PCI and avoid unnecessary procedures.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
1,400 people
Ages
19 years and older
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You are at least 19 years old
  • You recently had an acute STEMI or NSTEMI heart attack
  • You had your main (culprit) blocked artery treated with a stent soon after symptoms began
  • You have multivessel disease, meaning more than one artery has a significant narrowing (not just the culprit one)
  • A study team can explain the invasive tests and you (or a legal representative) agree in writing

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT04968808Recruiting
Find best timing for stent procedure in NSTEMI with multiple vessel disease

This trial compares when to do a stent procedure (PCI) in people with NSTEMI who have disease in more than one coronary artery (non-IRA). It may help doctors choose the safest and most effective timing for treatment to improve outcomes.

Gwangju
NCT07446023Recruiting
Testing a new way to measure heart artery blockages

This study compares two advanced imaging methods (IVUS and FFR) to see which better identifies blockages that need treatment. It may help doctors decide the best care for people with chest pain or recent heart attacks.

Beijing, Beijing Municipality
NCT07616024Not yet recruiting
Ultrasound Guidance vs. X-ray for Heart Attack Treatment

This study compares two ways doctors guide treatment during emergency heart attack procedures: using ultrasound imaging (IVUS) versus standard X-ray imaging. The goal is to see which method leads to better outcomes and fewer complications.

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality
NCT07512778Recruiting
Heart stent placement guided by ultrasound vs. imaging

This trial compares two ways doctors place heart stents in patients having a heart attack or unstable chest pain. One method uses ultrasound imaging inside the artery (IVUS), and the other uses standard X-ray imaging. The goal is to see which approach leads to better outcomes.

Seoul, Eunpyeong-gu
NCT07598565Not yet recruiting
Testing a new heart imaging method after emergency artery treatment

This trial tests a new imaging technique called μFR to help doctors decide which blockages in your heart arteries need treatment after you've had a heart attack. It may help identify which blockages are most dangerous and need fixing soon versus those that can wait.

Roma, RM
NCT06274645Recruiting
Study of IVUS for Complex Heart Procedures

This study will look at how using a special ultrasound (IVUS) during a heart procedure (PCI) can help people with complex blockages, such as heavy calcium or multiple narrowings. It aims to see if this approach improves outcomes.

Shanghai

Hear when a new ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.