Clin2
NCT05981222Possibly a fitEnrolling by invitation

Osteo Match vs. PEEK cages for spinal fusion in osteoporosis

OsteoporosisDegenerative Lumbar DiseaseDegeneration Spine

Part of Bones, joints & muscles, Hormones & metabolism clinical trials.

This study compares two types of cages used in spinal fusion surgery for people with osteoporosis. It aims to see if one type leads to better bone healing and stability.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
1,500 people
Ages
50 years and older
Study type
Observational

Who can take part

  • You are 50 years or older
  • You have a degenerative lower back condition that needs spinal fusion with screws, like spinal stenosis or spondylolisthesis
  • You have tried at least 3 months of non-surgical treatments without relief
  • You have been diagnosed with osteoporosis using a bone density test (like DXA or QCT)
  • You need a fusion cage placed in the lower spine between L3 and S1
  • You have chosen the type of fusion cage to be used

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT04418830Enrolling by invitation
Study of a spine cage implant for degenerative back problems

This trial studies how well specific lumbar (lower back) implant “cages” help fuse vertebrae in people with degenerative disc disease, spinal slippage, narrowing, curvature, or forward-bending deformity. It may help by testing an approach to improve stability and reduce symptoms after surgery.

La Jolla, California
NCT07777718Not yet recruiting
Lumbar fusion with nanotube versus titanium cage

This study compares two types of cages used in a spinal fusion surgery to see if one helps bones heal better and reduces pain. It may help people with degenerative disc disease in the lower back who haven't improved with other treatments.

Lexington, Kentucky
NCT05691062Enrolling by invitation· Phase 4
Titanium versus PEEK for one-level back fusion

This trial compares two different implanted materials (titanium vs. PEEK) used in a one-level spinal fusion for people with lumbar stenosis and spondylolisthesis. It’s meant to see which device performs better after surgery for pain and leg symptoms when non-surgical treatments haven’t helped.

Minneapolis, Minnesota
NCT06704919Recruiting
Spinal fusion using conduit cages and bone graft putty

This trial tests a new combination of a cage and bone graft putty for spinal fusion surgery. It is for people with degenerative disc disease or a herniated disc in the neck or lower back that needs surgery.

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
NCT07430163Not yet recruiting
Comparing two types of cervical spine implants for neck surgery

This trial compares two different implants used in neck surgery to treat worn-out discs. The goal is to see which implant works better for pain and recovery.

NCT07312747Not yet recruiting
Comparing two types of cages for spinal fusion surgery

This trial compares two ways of placing supportive cages in the lower spine during a fusion surgery — either two straight cages or one curved (banana) cage. The goal is to see which approach gives better pain relief and stability for people with disc problems.

Hear when a new Osteoporosis trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.