Clin2
NCT06241651Possibly a fitRecruiting

Comparing two types of pacemakers for heart failure patients

Conduction System PacingBiventricular PacingCardiac Resynchronization TherapyRight Ventricular PacingHeart Failure

Part of Heart & circulation clinical trials.

This trial tests if a new pacemaker method (CSP) works better than the standard method (BiVP) for people with heart failure who already have a right ventricular pacemaker and need an upgrade.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
66 people
Ages
18 years to 80 years
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You have heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction (LVEF below 50%)
  • You have had a right ventricular pacemaker for at least 3 months
  • Your heart failure symptoms are moderate to severe (NYHA class II to IV)
  • You have elevated NT-proBNP levels in your blood
  • Your right ventricle is paced more than 40% of the time
  • You are between 18 and 80 years old

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT06052475Recruiting
Pacemaker upgrade study for heart failure

This trial is for people with a standard pacemaker that stimulates the right ventricle most of the time. It tests whether a newer type of pacemaker (CRT) can improve heart function and symptoms. If you have a weakened heart (LVEF between 35-50%) and your heart failure has gotten worse, this study may be a good fit.

Cambridge
NCT07492979Recruiting
Pacemaker placement study for heart failure

This trial compares two types of pacemaker placement to improve heart function in people with heart failure. One method paces the heart's natural conduction system, while the other paces the lower chambers of the heart. The goal is to find which approach works better for heart resynchronization therapy.

Aarhus
NCT05650658Recruiting
Compare two heart pacing options in people with weak heart function

This trial compares two types of “left-side” heart pacing to see which one works better in people with weak heart pumping. It may help guide the best pacing choice for improving heart function and symptoms.

Gilbert, Arizona
NCT03215849Enrolling by invitation
Tested pacing device for heart failure with preserved pumping

This trial studies a heart pacing approach in people with heart failure symptoms despite preserved heart pumping. It aims to see whether changing heart timing can improve how you feel and how your heart works during exercise.

Cardiff
NCT05769036Recruiting
Biventricular vs left bundle pacing for heart failure outcomes

This trial compares two types of heart pacing to see which improves outcomes for people with heart failure. It may help those who need pacing to better coordinate heartbeats and relieve symptoms.

Tomsk
NCT07107048Not yet recruiting
Comparing two pacing methods for heart failure treatment

This trial tests if a newer pacing method called left bundle branch area pacing works as well as standard cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) for people with heart failure and a specific heart blockage (left bundle branch block). It aims to offer an effective treatment option with potentially easier setup.

Rome

Hear when a new Conduction System Pacing trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.