Clin2
NCT06794359Possibly a fitEnrolling by invitation

Comparing minimally invasive vs. traditional bypass for multi-vessel heart disease

Coronary Arterial Disease (CAD)Coronary Artery Bypass

Part of Heart & circulation clinical trials.

This study compares two types of heart bypass surgery for people with blockages in multiple heart arteries: a newer, less invasive technique (minimally invasive CABG) versus the traditional open-chest approach. It aims to see which approach leads to better recovery and outcomes.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
100 people
Ages
18 years and older
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You are 18 years or older.
  • You have narrowing in two or three major heart arteries that need bypass surgery, including a blocked left main artery or the front artery of the heart.
  • Your doctor has ruled out stent placement (angioplasty) because your blockages are too severe or complex for stents.
  • You are in stable condition (recent heart attack? your heart enzyme levels must be back to normal).
  • You do not have serious lung disease, kidney failure, obesity, or other major health problems that make surgery risky.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT07172620Recruiting
Heart bypass surgery without clamping the aorta

This study tests a special technique for heart bypass surgery that avoids clamping the aorta. It may help people with hardened arteries in the aorta who need bypass surgery but are not good candidates for standard clamping.

Beijing, Beijing Municipality
NCT07314138Recruiting
Comparing two minimally invasive heart bypass surgeries for three-vessel disease

This trial compares two types of heart bypass surgery for people with blockages in three main heart arteries. It tests a hybrid approach that combines a small incision bypass with a stent, versus a standard off-pump bypass. This may mean less recovery time for some patients.

Leuven, Vlaams Brabant
NCT07057713Not yet recruiting
Comparing two bypass surgery methods for multiple blocked arteries

This study compares two ways of doing bypass surgery for blocked heart arteries: using only chest and arm arteries versus a mix of arteries and leg veins. The goal is to see which approach works better for long-term heart health.

Changchun, Jilin
NCT05835167Not yet recruiting
Smaller cut for heart bypass surgery in multi-vessel disease

This trial compares two types of heart bypass surgery for people with blockages in multiple coronary arteries. The study uses a smaller cut in the breastbone to see if it leads to similar results and faster recovery.

NCT04795193Enrolling by invitation
Minithoracotomy vs open surgery for multiple blocked heart arteries

This trial compares two types of bypass surgery for people with multiple blocked heart arteries, to see which one better improves quality of life and how well the bypasses stay open. You may be assigned based on your preferences, and the study also tracks heart scan and follow-up results.

Beijing, Beijing Municipality
NCT05504031Not yet recruiting
Comparing hybrid heart treatment to bypass surgery for multi-vessel disease

This study compares two ways to treat blockages in multiple heart arteries: one is standard bypass surgery, the other combines a less invasive stent procedure with bypass surgery. The goal is to see which approach works better with fewer risks while fully restoring blood flow to your heart.

Leuven

Hear when a new Coronary Arterial Disease (CAD) trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.