Clin2
NCT06943690Possibly a fitNot yet recruiting

Robotic surgery options for rectal cancer

Rectal CancerSurgery

Part of Cancer, Digestive system clinical trials.

This trial compares two types of robotic surgery for rectal cancer to see if they are equally safe and effective. It helps patients understand which approach might be better for their recovery and outcomes.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
212 people
Ages
18 years to 80 years
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You must be between 18 and 80 years old.
  • You must have rectal cancer confirmed by biopsy (pathology) that has not spread far (stage T1-T3, N0-N1, M0).
  • Your tumor must be in the middle or upper part of the rectum, with the lower edge at least 5 centimeters from the anal opening.
  • Your tumor must be 10 centimeters or smaller.
  • You must be in good overall health (able to care for yourself, ECOG 0-1) and have no other active cancers.
  • You must not have had stomach or intestinal surgery before (except appendix removal), and must not have conditions that require emergency surgery.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT04200027Not yet recruiting
Comparing robotic versus TaTME surgery for rectal cancer

This study compares two ways of performing rectal cancer surgery: robotic surgery and a newer technique called TaTME (transanal total mesorectal excision). It aims to see which approach has better outcomes for patients. If you're having surgery for rectal cancer, this trial might help you get access to advanced surgical options.

Svendborg, Southern Denmark
NCT06956976Not yet recruiting
Comparing lymph node removal in robotic rectal cancer surgery

This trial compares two ways of removing lymph nodes (small glands that help fight infection) during robotic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer. It aims to see whether removing fewer lymph nodes may be just as effective and cause fewer side effects than removing a larger group of them.

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality
NCT02649647Recruiting
Surgery plan for rectal cancer after chemo-radiation

This trial looks at a specific type of rectal surgery after you’ve already finished chemo-radiation, aiming to remove the tumor while trying to preserve the anal sphincter (muscle control). It’s meant for people whose cancer can be safely operated on and who don’t have spread to distant organs.

Guangzhou, Guangdong
NCT06824688Recruiting
Comparing robotic surgery types for rectal cancer

This trial compares two robotic surgery methods for rectal cancer: using one small incision (single-port) versus several small incisions (multi-port). The goal is to see which approach offers better outcomes while preserving the sphincter (the muscle that controls bowel movements).

Chongqing
NCT06906952Enrolling by invitation
Robotic surgery through the anus vs. standard robotic surgery for rectal cancer

This trial compares two robotic surgery methods for high rectal and sigmoid colon cancer—one that removes the tumor through the anus (NOSES-IV) and the traditional assisted approach. It aims to see which way may lead to better recovery.

Nanchang
NCT07651553Recruiting
Transanal vs. Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer

This trial compares two surgical approaches to remove rectal cancer while preserving bowel function. Researchers want to see which method—performed through the anus or with robotic assistance—leads to better outcomes and quality of life.

Guangzhou, Guangdong

Hear when a new Rectal Cancer trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.