Comparing two breathing supports after tube removal in newborns
Part of Lungs & breathing clinical trials.
This study compares two types of noninvasive breathing support (NHFOV and NIMV) used after a premature baby's breathing tube is removed. The goal is to see which method helps babies breathe more smoothly after extubation.
Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.
Who can take part
- Your baby was born at or after 26 weeks of pregnancy.
- Your baby is less than 44 weeks old (from the last menstrual period) when joining the study.
- Your baby has been on a breathing tube for at least 24 hours because of breathing problems.
- This is the first time the breathing tube is being removed.
- Your baby does not have a major heart or lung defect, airway problem, or muscle condition that affects breathing.
- Your baby does not need surgery during the study period, and a parent or guardian must agree to the study.
Quick eligibility check
Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.
Similar studies
Other trials that look related to this one.
This study compares two gentle ways of helping premature babies breathe (using a mask or small tubes in the nose) to see which works better for babies with breathing problems. It aims to find the best way to support babies born early who need help taking their first breaths.
This trial compares two types of breathing support (high-flow nasal cannula vs. non-invasive ventilation) in children who have recently had heart surgery and are at high risk of having trouble breathing after their breathing tube is removed. The goal is to see which method works better to help them breathe on their own.
This trial tests whether giving noninvasive breathing support (using a mask or similar device, without a new breathing tube) right after removing a breathing tube works better for severely obese adults. It mainly looks at people at higher risk of needing help breathing again after extubation.
This study compares two breathing supports used after a breathing tube is removed in the ICU: a noninvasive ventilator (mask-based) versus high-flow nasal oxygen. It aims to see which one works better when patients develop breathing trouble soon after extubation.
This study compares two ways of helping very preterm infants breathe: a special high-frequency ventilation method versus the standard mechanical ventilator. It aims to see which method works better for preterm babies with breathing failure soon after birth.
This study compares two types of breathing support—a high-flow nasal cannula and noninvasive ventilation—to see which one better prevents the need for re-inserting a breathing tube in people with systolic heart failure who are at high risk for breathing problems after the tube is removed.
Hear when a new Extubation Failure in Neonates trial opens
We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.