Comparing two ablation methods for repeat atrial fibrillation treatment
Part of Heart & circulation clinical trials.
This trial tests a newer type of energy (pulsed field ablation) against the standard heat-based method (radiofrequency) for people who have already had one ablation and now have atrial fibrillation again. The goal is to see which works better for keeping your heart in a normal rhythm.
Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.
Who can take part
- You have had one previous ablation for atrial fibrillation (with cryoballoon, heat, or pulsed field) within the last 5 years.
- You have atrial fibrillation that comes and goes (paroxysmal AF) and lasts at least 30 seconds, and it causes symptoms.
- You are between 18 and 80 years old.
- You are willing to have all the follow-up visits and tests needed for the study.
- You do not have any health issues that make the procedure unsafe, such as low heart function, severe lung disease, or a history of blood clots.
Quick eligibility check
Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.
Similar studies
Other trials that look related to this one.
This trial compares two types of repeat ablation for people whose persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) has come back after a prior procedure. It tests whether adding isolation of the back wall of the heart's left atrium to the standard vein isolation improves outcomes. If you have had up to two prior AF ablations and are willing to be followed, you may qualify.
This study compares two ways to perform a heart procedure called ablation to treat atrial fibrillation, a condition that causes an irregular heartbeat. The goal is to find out which approach is safer and more effective at restoring a normal heart rhythm.
This trial compares different techniques for a second heart ablation procedure in people with atrial fibrillation (AFib) who have already had one ablation. It aims to find the best approach to stop AFib from coming back.
This trial tests a newer, possibly safer way to treat persistent atrial fibrillation using pulsed field ablation. It compares standard vein isolation alone to adding extra ablation spots to improve success.
This trial compares two different energy methods (electroporation vs radiofrequency ablation) guided by 3D imaging for people who have had a prior ablation for atrial fibrillation but still have recurrences. It aims to find which method is safer and more effective for repeat procedures.
This trial tests a new type of ablation (pulsed field ablation) against standard radiofrequency ablation for people with persistent atrial fibrillation that hasn't been controlled well by medication. The goal is to see which method works better and is safer.
Hear when a new Atrial Fibrillation Recurrent trial opens
We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.