Comparing two ablation methods for repeat atrial fibrillation treatment
Part of Heart & circulation clinical trials.
This trial tests a newer type of energy (pulsed field ablation) against the standard heat-based method (radiofrequency) for people who have already had one ablation and now have atrial fibrillation again. The goal is to see which works better for keeping your heart in a normal rhythm.
Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.
Who can take part
- You have had one previous ablation for atrial fibrillation (with cryoballoon, heat, or pulsed field) within the last 5 years.
- You have atrial fibrillation that comes and goes (paroxysmal AF) and lasts at least 30 seconds, and it causes symptoms.
- You are between 18 and 80 years old.
- You are willing to have all the follow-up visits and tests needed for the study.
- You do not have any health issues that make the procedure unsafe, such as low heart function, severe lung disease, or a history of blood clots.
Quick eligibility check
Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.
Similar studies
Other trials that look related to this one.
This trial compares two different ways of delivering pulsed field ablation—a newer, targeted energy that zaps abnormal heart tissue—for people with atrial fibrillation. It aims to see if a single broader application works as well as a more focused, two-step approach, and it may help you feel better if you have symptoms from this irregular heartbeat.
This trial compares different techniques for a second heart ablation procedure in people with atrial fibrillation (AFib) who have already had one ablation. It aims to find the best approach to stop AFib from coming back.
This trial tests a newer, possibly safer way to treat persistent atrial fibrillation using pulsed field ablation. It compares standard vein isolation alone to adding extra ablation spots to improve success.
This trial compares two different energy methods (electroporation vs radiofrequency ablation) guided by 3D imaging for people who have had a prior ablation for atrial fibrillation but still have recurrences. It aims to find which method is safer and more effective for repeat procedures.
This trial compares two ways to treat persistent atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat that lasts for months or years). One method uses pulsed field energy and the other uses radiofrequency heat to fix the heart's electrical signals. The goal is to see which method is safer and more effective for patients having their first ablation procedure.
This trial tests whether adding extra ablation lines to the standard pulmonary vein isolation procedure is more effective for people with persistent atrial fibrillation that hasn't been helped by medications. The goal is to improve symptoms like palpitations, fatigue, and shortness of breath.
Hear when a new Atrial Fibrillation Recurrent trial opens
We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.