Comparing energy types for repeat atrial fibrillation treatment
Part of Heart & circulation clinical trials.
This trial compares two different energy methods (electroporation vs radiofrequency ablation) guided by 3D imaging for people who have had a prior ablation for atrial fibrillation but still have recurrences. It aims to find which method is safer and more effective for repeat procedures.
Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.
Who can take part
- You have recurrent atrial fibrillation or an atypical atrial flutter after a prior pulmonary vein isolation procedure
- You are eligible to undergo another pulmonary vein isolation procedure
- Your left ventricular ejection fraction is 30% or higher
- Your left atrial volume index is 72 mL/m² or less
- You do not have untreated hyperthyroidism, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, or severe valvular heart disease
Quick eligibility check
Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.
Similar studies
Other trials that look related to this one.
This trial tests a new way to treat non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) using a focused type of ablation (pulsed-field energy) on specific areas of the heart. It aims to see if targeting the left atrial wall and mitral isthmus can improve outcomes for people who have not had this procedure before.
This trial compares two ways to treat persistent atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat that lasts for months or years). One method uses pulsed field energy and the other uses radiofrequency heat to fix the heart's electrical signals. The goal is to see which method is safer and more effective for patients having their first ablation procedure.
This study compares two procedures to treat persistent atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat that lasts more than a week). It looks at whether a newer method (pulsed-field ablation) works better than the standard method (radiofrequency ablation), both combined with a chemical injection to improve treatment success.
This trial compares two minimally invasive heart procedures for persistent atrial fibrillation (a type of irregular heartbeat). The aim is to see which one is safer and more effective at restoring a normal heart rhythm.
This trial compares two different ways of delivering pulsed field ablation—a newer, targeted energy that zaps abnormal heart tissue—for people with atrial fibrillation. It aims to see if a single broader application works as well as a more focused, two-step approach, and it may help you feel better if you have symptoms from this irregular heartbeat.
This trial tests whether one ablation approach works better than another for paroxysmal (intermittent) atrial fibrillation by targeting the heart’s “triggers” and “substrate” (where the rhythm problem is). If you qualify, you’ll be randomly assigned to one of two ablation energy methods during a pulmonary vein isolation procedure.
Hear when a new Ablation Techniques trial opens
We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.