Clin2
NCT07065656Possibly a fitNot yet recruiting

Comparing two breathing support methods for type 2 respiratory failure

Respiratory FailureHypoxiaHypercapnia

Part of Lungs & breathing clinical trials.

This trial compares two types of non-invasive breathing support (through a mask) to see which is more effective for people with type 2 respiratory failure, a condition where the body can't get rid of carbon dioxide. If you qualify, you would receive one of these breathing treatments in the emergency department.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
84 people
Ages
21 years to 99 years
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You need to be 21 years old or older.
  • You must have respiratory failure with too much carbon dioxide in your blood (type 2 respiratory failure).
  • You must be able to use a non-invasive breathing machine (a mask that helps you breathe) in the emergency department.
  • You must not have a do-not-resuscitate order that refuses breathing support.
  • You must not have severe facial injuries or skull fractures that would prevent wearing a breathing mask.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT05089695Recruiting
Compare noninvasive breathing supports for breathing failure

This trial compares different ways to help you breathe without a breathing tube: helmet NIV, CPAP, or high-flow nasal oxygen. It aims to see which support works best for people who have sudden (acute) low oxygen levels.

Rome
NCT06671015Recruiting
Comparing breathing support methods after a breathing tube is removed in people with heart failure

This study compares two types of breathing support—a high-flow nasal cannula and noninvasive ventilation—to see which one better prevents the need for re-inserting a breathing tube in people with systolic heart failure who are at high risk for breathing problems after the tube is removed.

New Haven, Connecticut
NCT06029699Not yet recruiting
High-flow nasal cannula versus noninvasive ventilation to prevent reintubation

This trial compares two breathing support methods used after a breathing tube is removed, to see which works better at preventing the need for the tube to be put back in. If you or your loved one is being taken off a ventilator, this study could help choose the safest way to support breathing.

NCT07521254Recruiting
High-flow oxygen and breathing support for acute respiratory failure

This trial tests whether high-flow oxygen delivered through the nose, combined with non-invasive breathing support (a mask that helps you breathe without a tube down your throat), can help patients with sudden severe breathing problems. The goal is to improve oxygen levels and avoid the need for a breathing tube.

Minya, Minya Governorate
NCT07067502Not yet recruiting
Comparing two breathing support methods after ventilator removal

This trial compares two ways to help people breathe after they come off a ventilator in the intensive care unit. It tests whether a special vest that helps with breathing (biphasic cuirass ventilation) works better than the standard mask-based breathing support.

NCT06746636Not yet recruiting
Comparing ways to remove breathing support in respiratory failure

This study compares four different ways to remove breathing support from people who have low oxygen levels. The goal is to find the most effective method to help you breathe on your own.

Hear when a new Respiratory Failure trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.