Comparing treatment options for atrial fibrillation in people with heart failure

This trial compares two ways to control atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat) in older patients: destroying a small area of the heart's electrical pathway and implanting a pacemaker, versus a procedure to isolate the veins that trigger the irregular beats. The goal is to see which approach gives you better results and fits your preferences.

This study compares two procedures for people who have both atrial fibrillation (AFib) and heart failure: one that slows the heart's electrical signals (AV node ablation) and one that helps the heart pump in a more coordinated way (cardiac resynchronization). Both are options when medications alone aren't enough, and the goal is to improve symptoms and quality of life.

This trial compares two ways to treat atrial fibrillation in people with heart failure where the heart's pumping strength is still normal. You'll either get a procedure called ablation to restore normal rhythm or medication to control your heart rate. The goal is to see which approach works better for people like you.

This study compares two types of ablation (a procedure that uses energy to fix irregular heartbeats) for people with persistent atrial fibrillation. It tests whether adding extra treatment to the back of the heart's left upper chamber helps improve outcomes compared to standard treatment alone.

This study compares two treatments for people with atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat) and a specific type of heart failure. It looks at whether a procedure called catheter ablation (which uses heat to fix the heart's rhythm) works better than taking daily heart rhythm medications.

This trial compares two minimally invasive heart procedures for persistent atrial fibrillation (a type of irregular heartbeat). The aim is to see which one is safer and more effective at restoring a normal heart rhythm.