Clin2
NCT06736899Possibly a fitRecruiting

Orbital atherectomy versus standard care for calcified branch blockages

Coronary Artery DiseaseCoronary Disease

Part of Heart & circulation clinical trials.

This trial compares a special device called orbital atherectomy to the usual procedure for treating hardened, calcified blockages that occur where a coronary artery branches. It aims to see which approach works better for patients needing a stent.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
200 people
Ages
18 years and older
Study type
Interventional

Who can take part

  • You are 18 years or older.
  • You have a moderate to severely hardened blockage at a spot where an artery splits into a smaller branch (the side branch is at least 2mm wide).
  • You are scheduled to have a stent placed in that artery (a procedure called PCI).
  • You agree to join the study and sign a consent form.
  • You are not planning to move away, and your doctor thinks you can be followed for one year.
  • You have not had the same artery treated with a stent or surgery in the last 9 months.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT06507449Enrolling by invitation
Treating Heavily Calcified Heart Blockages to Improve Microcirculation

This study is testing a technique to treat heavily calcified (hard) blockages in heart arteries. The goal is to see if a special way of preparing the blockage before placing a stent helps improve blood flow to the tiny blood vessels in the heart muscle.

Katowice
NCT06551662Recruiting
Balloon vs. stent for split artery blockages

This trial compares two ways to open a blocked artery that splits into two branches (a bifurcation): using a balloon coated with medicine (drug-coated balloon, or DCB) versus a drug-eluting stent (DES). The goal is to see which approach works better for patients with this type of blockage.

Milan
NCT05353946Recruiting
Rotational atherectomy elective vs emergency for heavily calcified blockages

This trial compares doing a special procedure (rotational atherectomy) before an emergency is needed versus using it as a rescue during a heart artery procedure. It is designed for people with very hard, calcified artery blockages and long-term kidney impairment, to see which approach works better and is safer.

Madrid
NCT05346068Recruiting
Compare two balloon types for calcium-heavy blocked heart arteries

This trial studies whether one type of balloon works better than another for treating badly calcified (hardened) coronary artery blockages. If you qualify, you would be randomly assigned to get the tested balloon treatment during your heart procedure.

Lucerne
NCT06954714Recruiting
Balloon vs stent for new heart blockages

This trial compares two treatments for new blockages in heart arteries: a drug-coated balloon (a tiny balloon that delivers medicine) versus a drug-eluting stent (a small mesh tube that releases medicine). The study hopes to see which approach keeps the artery open longer and is safer over time.

Busan, Busan
NCT06736665Recruiting
Comparing two ways to treat hardened calcium in heart arteries

This trial compares two techniques (orbital atherectomy and intravascular lithotripsy) to break up tough calcium deposits in the heart's arteries that can block blood flow. If you have a calcified nodule and are having a non-emergency procedure to open a blocked artery, this study may help guide which method works best.

Alicante, Alicante

Hear when a new Coronary artery disease trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.