Clin2
NCT07313501Likely a fitRecruiting

Comparing PERC and YEARS for diagnosing pulmonary embolism

Pulmonary Embolism

Part of Heart & circulation, Lungs & breathing clinical trials.

This study compares two ways of checking for a pulmonary embolism (a blood clot in the lung) in the emergency room. It looks at the PERC score and the YEARS algorithm to see if they can help doctors decide when to do a D-dimer test and chest imaging, potentially reducing unnecessary tests.

Summary written for real people, not researchers, by Clin2.

Phase
N/A
Enrollment
500 people
Ages
18 years and older
Study type
Observational

Who can take part

  • You are 18 years or older.
  • You visited the emergency department and had a D-dimer blood test.
  • You had a chest CT scan or a lung scan (V/Q scan) to check for a pulmonary embolism.
  • You are not on long-term blood thinner medication.

View the official record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Quick eligibility check

Answer a few plain-language questions, based on this study's own requirements, to get a preliminary sense of fit.

Similar studies

Other trials that look related to this one.

NCT06320236Recruiting
Emergency study on testing for blood clots in the lungs

This study looks at how doctors decide to test for pulmonary embolism (a blood clot in the lungs) in the emergency department. It helps understand what factors lead to testing, which could improve care for future patients.

Hamilton, Ontario
NCT07603700Not yet recruiting
Comparing treatments for a serious type of blood clot in the lungs

This study compares different real-world treatments for a serious but stable type of blood clot in the lungs (called intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism). It aims to see which treatments work best in everyday patients, including those with other health conditions.

Nanjing, Jiangsu
NCT05050617Recruiting
Ultrasound in the ER to predict risks in pulmonary embolism

This trial checks whether a bedside ultrasound done in the emergency room can help predict which people with an acute pulmonary embolism are more likely to have bad outcomes. If you qualify, your care team will compare ultrasound findings with your later results to see if it can guide treatment decisions sooner.

York, Pennsylvania
NCT06453876Recruiting· Phase 3
Comparing clot removal, low-dose clot dissolver, and heparin for high-risk lung clot

This trial compares three treatments for an intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism: a minimally invasive clot removal procedure (embolectomy), a low-dose clot-dissolving medication, or standard blood thinning (heparin). The goal is to see which approach works best to prevent worsening while reducing bleeding risks.

Copenhagen
NCT05103670Recruiting
PET/CT lung scan to assess recovery after pulmonary embolism

This study uses a special scan (PET/CT) and an inhaled/linked tracer to measure how well air and blood flow work in different lung areas after a pulmonary embolism. It’s meant to better understand regional lung function and how rehabilitation may help some people recover.

Brest
NCT07641400Not yet recruiting
Pulmonary artery pressure to predict blood clots in the lungs

This study looks at whether a heart ultrasound measurement called pulmonary artery pressure can help doctors predict if a patient with shortness of breath has a blood clot in the lungs. It compares current pressure readings with past readings to see if changes might signal a clot.

Antalya

Hear when a new Pulmonary Embolism trial opens

We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.