Clinical trials
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection clinical trials
Below are recruiting endoscopic mucosal resection clinical trials, each written for real people, not researchers. We’re tracking 26 recruiting studies, each written for real people, not researchers, below.
Recruiting studies
- NCT07759960Recruiting
Removing small rectal tumors with two endoscopic methods
This study compares two minimally invasive ways to remove small rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), which are growths in the rectum that are usually not cancer. The goal is to find which method is safer and more effective with fewer side effects.
Guangzhou, GuangdongAges 18–75 - NCT07315893Recruiting
Closing stomach defects with a stitching device
This trial tests a special stitching tool to close holes in the stomach after removing abnormal growths. It may help patients heal better after a routine procedure to remove suspicious tissue.
Tel AvivAges 18 years+ - NCT07728292Recruiting
Underwater removal of small gastric neuroendocrine tumors
This trial tests a special underwater technique to remove small type I gastric neuroendocrine tumors (5-9 mm) during an endoscopy. The goal is to see if it is safe and effective, which could offer a less invasive treatment option.
Hyderabad, TelanganaAges 18–65 - NCT06097637Recruiting
Removing large stalked colon polyps: a comparison of two methods
This study compares two ways to remove large, stalked polyps in the colon. One method uses water to lift the polyp before cutting it, and the other uses a small metal clip and a hot snare. The goal is to find which technique is safer and more effective.
Ningbo, ZhejiangAges 18–75 - NCT07041255Recruiting
Cold vs. Hot Loop Snare for Medium Colon Polyps
This trial compares two techniques (cold vs. hot loop snare) to remove medium-sized, non-cancerous colon polyps. It aims to find which method is safer and more effective for polyps that are 10–14 mm and flat or slightly raised.
MoscowAges 18–100 - NCT04008407Recruiting
Monitoring outcomes after removing certain colon growths
This study follows patients who are having surgery to remove a specific type of flat colon growth. It aims to see how safe and effective a “selective” approach is, based on what the growth looks like and your situation.
Westmead, New South WalesAges 18 years+ - NCT04593407Recruiting
Check the best method to remove large flat colon polyps
This study compares two endoscopy techniques to remove large, flat-looking colon polyps. It aims to see which method removes the polyp more completely and safely.
MadridAges 18–85 - NCT04780256Recruiting
Study of removing digestive tumors with an endoscopy procedure
This trial looks at people (18 or older) who already had a digestive tract tumor removed using an endoscopy procedure. It may help doctors learn how this approach works and what outcomes to expect after removal.
Reggio Emilia, REAges 18–100 - NCT05041478Recruiting
Cold removal method for large colon polyps
This trial compares two cold endoscopic techniques to remove certain large, non-cancerous colon polyps with better control of bleeding and leftover tissue. You may be offered one of the two removal methods during your scheduled colonoscopy.
Westmead, New South WalesAges 18 years+ - NCT06077981Recruiting
Comparing two fluids for removing surface esophageal tumors
This trial tests two different fluids (hyaluronic acid and hydroxyethylamide) used during a procedure to remove early-stage esophageal cancer. The goal is to see which fluid works better to help the doctor remove the tumor safely.
São Paulo, São PauloAges 18 years+ - NCT06815406Recruiting
Removing large colon polyps: one piece vs. multiple pieces
This trial compares two ways to remove large, flat polyps (granular type) from the colon or rectum: one that removes the polyp in one piece (endoscopic submucosal dissection) and one that removes it in pieces (endoscopic mucosal resection). The goal is to see which method has a lower chance of the polyp coming back.
BolognaAges 18 years+ - NCT07161479Recruiting
Comparing two ways to remove small stomach growths
This study compares two ways to remove tiny, non-cancerous stomach growths—using a gentle heat tool (argon plasma coagulation) or a special scope to cut them out. The goal is to see which method is safer and works better.
Goyang-siAges 20 years+ - NCT02306603Recruiting
Follow-up after endoscopic removal of certain duodenum tumors
This study looks at long-term outcomes after removing a growth in the duodenum or near the bile/pancreas opening (ampulla) using an endoscope. You may benefit by closely monitoring your recovery and long-term health after the procedure.
Sydney, New South WalesAges 18–99 - NCT06462521Enrolling by invitation
Comparing two ways to remove large polyps during a colonoscopy
This study compares two methods for removing larger polyps (flat growths) found during a colonoscopy. It tests if one technique works as well or better than the other for people with certain types of polyps.
Indianapolis, IndianaAges 18 years+ - NCT06160557Enrolling by invitation
Radiation after endoscopic surgery for superficial esophageal cancer
This trial tests if adding radiation therapy after endoscopic surgery (ESD) helps people with early-stage esophageal cancer that had certain high-risk features, like deeper invasion or positive margins. It aims to improve outcomes for those who didn't get a complete cure with surgery alone.
Fuzhou, FujianAges 18–75 - NCT06807073Recruiting
Closing the wound after large colon polyp removal
This study compares closing the wound after removing a large colon polyp to leaving it open. The goal is to see if closing the area reduces bleeding or other problems.
Montreal, QuebecAges 18 years+ - NCT06476145Recruiting
Testing two ways to reduce polyp regrowth after removal
This study looks at two different methods for removing large colon polyps to see which one better prevents polyps from coming back. It may help people who have a non-cancerous, flat polyp that is at least 20 mm wide.
Orlando, FloridaAges 18 years+ - NCT06937671Recruiting
Comparing two ways to remove large flat polyps
This trial tests two methods for removing large, flat polyps from the colon to see which works better. It uses a cold snare (a wire loop that doesn't use heat) with or without an extra fluid lift to make removal safer and more effective.
Weston, FloridaAges 18 years+ - NCT05678491Enrolling by invitation
Endoscopic treatment for reflux after gastric sleeve surgery
This trial studies an endoscopic procedure to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in people who had gastric sleeve surgery. It may help if reflux symptoms are not controlled on once-daily acid medicine (PPI) or if you cannot tolerate it and want an alternative.
TrondheimAges 18–70 - NCT05746884Recruiting
Gel to prevent bleeding after ampulla surgery
This trial tests whether a blood-clotting gel (PuraStat®) can help prevent bleeding after endoscopic removal of certain ampulla/duodenal growths. You might be offered the gel during the procedure to lower the risk of post-procedure bleeding.
LyonAges 18 years+ - NCT07448129Recruiting
Testing SUBMO for removing large colon growths
This trial tests a new liquid called SUBMO that doctors inject under large growths in the colon to make them easier to remove during a colonoscopy. It may help people who need a colon polyp or other lesion removed.
Barcelona, BarcelonaAges 18 years+ - NCT05381792Recruiting
Test of gut bacteria changes after colon tumor removal
This study looks at how the gut’s bacteria and bacterial gene signals change after doctors remove certain advanced growths in the colon using endoscopy. If you need an endoscopic procedure for an advanced adenoma or early colon cancer, your stool/bacteria samples may help researchers understand what changes after treatment.
Shatin, New TerritoriesAges 18–90 - NCT06057350Recruiting
Surgery versus endoscopy for early colon cancer with uncertain margins
This trial compares surgery versus an endoscopic procedure for people who had a colon polyp removed but some cancer cells may still be present at the edges. The goal is to see which approach leads to better outcomes and fewer side effects for early-stage colon cancer.
Oslo, AkershusAges 40 years+ - NCT05804331Recruiting
Endoscopy treatment study for large upper stomach/throat lesions
This trial studies a specialized endoscopy procedure to remove larger abnormal growths in the upper digestive tract. It may help people whose lesion size and depth make certain removal techniques a better fit.
Sydney, New South WalesAges 18 years+
Hear when a new Endoscopic Mucosal Resection trial opens
We’ll email you when one opens — at most once a week, no account needed, unsubscribe anytime.
Common questions
- Are there clinical trials for endoscopic mucosal resection?
- Yes. Clin2 currently lists 26 recruiting endoscopic mucosal resection studies from the U.S. registry, each rewritten for real people, not researchers, so you can see what it’s testing and who it’s for.
- How do I know if I qualify for a endoscopic mucosal resection trial?
- Each study lists its eligibility criteria — rules about age, diagnosis, and prior treatments. On every Clin2 trial page we explain these in words written for real people and offer a short, optional pre-screen for a fit read. The study team makes the final decision.
- Does it cost anything to join a endoscopic mucosal resection trial?
- Using Clin2 is always free. Many trials cover the cost of the study treatment and related visits; some reimburse travel. The study team explains exactly what’s covered before you decide.
Related conditions
Clin2 helps you find and understand clinical trials and does not provide medical advice. Study data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Talk with your doctor about whether a specific trial is right for you.